Charismatic Worship

[LouisvilleFan]

[quote name='Resurrexi' date='17 September 2009 - 06:59 PM' timestamp='1253224785' post='1968240']
That is completely incorrect. No bishop has any authority to restrict a priest of the Latin Church with faculties to say Mass from privately celebrating the extraordinary form of the Roman Rite. (cf. Summorum Pontificum, Art. 2)

If what you are claiming existed really did exist, you should have no problem finding it since Summorum Pontificum and the accompanying letter to bishops are both relatively short.
[/quote]

Even if the priest is teaching that the Novus Ordo is invalid?

I'm pretty sure there's a provision that in circumstances where incorrect teaching is being spread by an EF priest or through a parish where the EF is celebrated, that the bishop can place restrictions.

[Resurrexi]

[quote name='LouisvilleFan' date='20 September 2009 - 03:10 PM' timestamp='1253477422' post='1969819']
Even if the priest is teaching that the Novus Ordo is invalid? [/quote]

In accordance with, canon 1371, after having been warned by the local bishop, such a priest would be punished with a canonical penalty (presumably suspension or interdict). The priest would then not be able to celebrate the Mass according to any rite, use, or form.

[quote name='LouisvilleFan' date='20 September 2009 - 03:10 PM' timestamp='1253477422' post='1969819']
I'm pretty sure there's a provision that in circumstances where incorrect teaching is being spread by an EF priest or through a parish where the EF is celebrated, that the bishop can place restrictions.
[/quote]

The bishop could not altogether forbid the EF from being said in his diocese any more than he could forbid the OF from being said in his diocese. Obviously, the bishop should make sure that the EF Mass is being celebrated correctly, e.g., by making sure that the priests celebrating it can pronounce Latin words correctly.

Edited September 20, 2009 by Resurrexi