the Abbot Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 Im not voting for Bush. Im voting for Peroutka and the Constitution party [url="http://www.peroutka2004.com/"]http://www.peroutka2004.com/[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StColette Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 I would rather see Bush in the office again then Kerry any day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 As far as I as concerned there is only one presidental candidate. Kerry is automatically disqualified because he believes in child murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='Jul 25 2004, 06:13 PM'] As far as I as concerned there is only one presidental candidate. Kerry is automatically disqualified because he believes in child murder. [/quote] AMEN CMOM! Kerry is a baby killer!!! he is going to allow abortion if he gets elected.... :irate: how can he sleep at nite......knowing its wrong.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the Abbot Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 Is there any reason yall dont like Peroutka? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 [quote name='the Abbot' date='Jul 25 2004, 06:15 PM'] Is there any reason yall dont like Peroutka? [/quote] there is no way im going to have my vote have a [i]chance[/i] of helping Kerry be in office by voting for a third party...... no way no how :shame: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the Abbot Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 As long as people think that way the democrats and republicans will continue to tear this country down. But I understand specificaly with this election there is no way a 3rd party will win, but I have to vote my conscious and that means I cant vote for Bush or Kerry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 our party is run by the two-parties and until then (when its very likely to make a bigger difference otherwise, right now its not) im going to stop them from gaining anything from me. but this election....kerry isn't giong to get a boost from me! im going to do my best to keep him out of office.....so he doesn't spread his pro-choice and liberal errors to our country and others......its criticial, society as we know it is on the verge of going complete flip-flop...... i dotn want gay marriages nor abortion progressing..... so im gonna try and stomp it out..... so....Bush 2004! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iacobus Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='curtins' date='Jul 25 2004, 04:11 PM'] hey you just stop there because we're STILLL feeling the effects of the Reagan economic policy. bush rules- period [/quote] They layoffs? Moreover, if you don't support Kerry because he supports abortion why do you support Reagan when the rate of abortions (reported to the CDC) increased under him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iacobus Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='Phikoz' date='Jul 25 2004, 04:22 PM'] start with abortion, and everything will follow. [/quote] Thats a heresy called gradulism (sp?). You can't stop sins one at a time or ween off them. You need to try your darnedess to stop them all and stop them now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 that's not a heresy on the governmental law level, but on the personal path to holiness level, if i'm not mistaken the rate of abortions is not directly connected to who is presiden. i don't buy the theory that Clinton caused less abortions. also: abortion must be made illegal. it is the duty of the state to make it illegal, and until it makes it illegal our government will be an evil institution that supports the murder of babies, regardless of whether abortion rates go up or down. we need to work to make the laws in line with morality. the illegalization of abortion (which is working step by step with imperfect legislation and cutting of federal funds) will cut down on abortion rates a TON more than any democrat social program. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iacobus Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='Aloysius' date='Jul 25 2004, 09:11 PM'] the rate of abortions is not directly connected to who is presiden. i don't buy the theory that Clinton caused less abortions. also: abortion must be made illegal. it is the duty of the state to make it illegal, and until it makes it illegal our government will be an evil institution that supports the murder of babies, regardless of whether abortion rates go up or down. we need to work to make the laws in line with morality. the illegalization of abortion (which is working step by step with imperfect legislation and cutting of federal funds) will cut down on abortion rates a TON more than any democrat social program. [/quote] I beg to differ on the effects of an out right ban of abortion. But I shaln't agure that byond this, don't treat the body chills, treat the illness, it works much better. So if nothing Clinton did had a decreasing effect on abortion, I am free for vote for John Kerry who better reps the Church outside of abortion, because abortion is purly a social trend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurkeFan Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='Iacobus' date='Jul 25 2004, 10:14 PM'] I beg to differ on the effects of an out right ban of abortion. But I shaln't agure that byond this, don't treat the body chills, treat the illness, it works much better. So if nothing Clinton did had a decreasing effect on abortion, I am free for vote for John Kerry who better reps the Church outside of abortion, because abortion is purly a social trend. [/quote] don't forget embryonic stem cell research, among other things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iacobus Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 Well Bush supports "limited" (LOL That is like dumb) embryonic stem cell. Hmm instead of kill 100 babies I shall only kill 50. Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 [quote name='Iacobus' date='Jul 26 2004, 12:24 AM'] Well Bush supports "limited" (LOL That is like dumb) embryonic stem cell. Hmm instead of kill 100 babies I shall only kill 50. Please. [/quote] Iacobus, the numbers are much different from your example. I don't support any embyronic stem cell research, but you must keep in mind that Bush at the very least has stopped any further lines from being created. He's not completely pro-life, but he's more pro-life than Kerry by far, and he is building a foundation which can be expanded upon by more pro-life presidents in years to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now