Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Theologian Of Choice


Resurrexi

  

78 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I prefer the modern theologians. Many of them had an intimacy with the medieval and patristic theologians, at the same time offering new insights and deeper understanding, and original ways of explaining the Deposit of Faith which are more relevant to me.

My favorites at the moment:

Karl Rahner
Avery Dulles
Ronald L. Conte Jr.
Thomas Merton (his earlier works)
Teihard de Chardin

I would also like to get into Henri de Lubac, and Karl Barth. There is also a good theologian teaching at Notre Dame now, but I forget his name.

In general I think it is good and important in one's search for truth to draw from many theologians, and several of the schools of thought. To pick and choose and decide what is true in a variety of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JMJ
2/25 - Ash Wednesday

I'm surprised that Duns Scotus made the list...sure, he was beatified, so his works can't be condemned...I've just never been comfortable with him. He seems to have provided the groundwork for nominalism and, ultimately, Protestantism.

If we're sticking to medieval theologians, then I have to go with Thomas. There are a number of reasons for this, but he seems to have the best synthesis of Augustine (the good parts), Gregory the Great, and Dionysius the Areopagite.

And if you're looking for a good, Latin discussion of Palamism, look at Yves Congar's work, [i]I Believe in the Holy Spirit[/i].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LouisvilleFan

According to [url="http://quizfarm.com/quizzes/new/svensvensven/which-theologian-are-you/"]this quiz[/url], I most follow St. Anselm and I need to add "Cur Deus Homo" to my reading list. I remember taking this quiz a few years ago and googled it just now to see if I'd get the same result, and I did, so maybe there is something to it.

My only complaint is one poorly worded question: "Infant Baptism is necessary to deal with original sin." They should drop the "Infant" part... the way it's worded, agreeing to it means unbaptized adults are stuck with original sin forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

St. Bonaventure because he encompasses the heart and the mind. I like St. Thomas Aquinas but I believe he leaves out much of the heart when dealing with Theology. You need both, imop. I do love Bl. Duns Scotus though too, I love the Franciscan approach to Theology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for St. Thomas Aquinas but my others would be:

Edith Stine (St. Benedicta of the Cross)
John Paul the Great
Gregory the Great

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='LouisvilleFan' post='1791456' date='Feb 25 2009, 03:33 PM']Anybody read "Cur Deus Homo"? Not sure what it means in English... "God Cures Homosexuality"?[/quote]

"Why is God Man?"

Edited by Resurrexi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='LouisvilleFan' post='1791456' date='Feb 25 2009, 03:33 PM']Anybody read "Cur Deus Homo"? Not sure what it means in English... "God Cures Homosexuality"?[/quote]

haha....

Why God became man... I read a while back... can;t say I remember a whole lot of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a fan of Bonaventure, although Aquinas is a close second. They both bring a unique theological perspective to the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
laetitia crucis

Hmmm... nice to see another very OLD thread pop back up. :mellow:

Anyhooo.... since it's already here, might as well add to it. :P

[quote]We so heartily approve the magnificent tribute of praise bestowed upon this most divine genius that [b]We consider that Thomas should be called not only the Angelic, but also the Common or Universal Doctor of the Church; for the Church has adopted his philosophy for her own, as innumerable documents of every kind attest[/b]. It would be an endless task to explain here all the reasons which moved Our Predecessors in this respect, and it will be sufficient perhaps to point out that Thomas wrote under the inspiration of the supernatural spirit which animated his life and that his writings, which contain the principles of, and the laws governing, all sacred studies, must be said to possess a universal character. -- Pope Pius XVI [url="http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/P11STUDI.HTM"]STUDIORUM DUCEM[/url] (On St. Thomas Aquinas), Encyclical promulgated on 29 June 1923.[/quote]

(Emphasis added. :hehehe: )

[img]http://www.aug.edu/augusta/iconography/biggerFiles/aquinasZurbaran.jpg[/img] :love:

Edited by laetitia crucis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

laetitia crucis

[quote name='Pio Nono' date='25 February 2009 - 09:48 AM' timestamp='1235566092' post='1791218']
JMJ
2/25 - Ash Wednesday

I'm surprised that Duns Scotus made the list...sure, he was beatified, so his works can't be condemned...[b]I've just never been comfortable with him. He seems to have provided the groundwork for nominalism and, ultimately, Protestantism[/b].

[/quote]

I agree. :huh:

However, I will say, "Blessed be God, Duns Scotus was SPOT ON about the Immaculate Conception!" ;) :love:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...