BLAZEr Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 PopeStPiusX, Not every post is meant to be a direct response to you. I'm merely posting for other's information. Don't take it personally, I post all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 Don't worry about me, I rarely take anything personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLAZEr Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 [quote name='popestpiusx' date='Mar 16 2004, 12:56 AM'] blazer's distinctions do not match up exactly either, though he said at the beginning that they were not hard and fast rules. There are a couple things in there that are blatantly false. [/quote] I'm curious as to what is blatantly false. Can you tell me? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 great info to read blazer.....gracias Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 Unless, they directly attack me, but then I don't really care. I tend to focus more on peoples argument than on whatever emotions are behind the argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 The following statement: Some traditionalists are the most extreme and they are better classified as "Sede Vacantists" They believe that the last valid Pope was Pius XII. They attend mass at the Chapels of the Society of St. Pius the X, or Society of St. Pius V. They believe John Paul II is an anti-pope humanist who is actively destroying the Church. It is blatantly false because a real sedevecantists would not be caught dead in a SSPX chapel, nor are they welcome there. They are bitter enemies. There are many who think the SSPX are sedevecantist. But as you are well aware, this is not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLAZEr Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 I'm sorry, but I personally know sedevacantists who attend the Latin Mass with the Society of St. Pius X. In fact, I know 4 families who would fit such a description. But I will concede that the Society itself does not have a formal sedevacantist position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 (edited) I would say they are pretty wishy washy sedevecantists then (I actually know someone like that as well). As to the last part, the society does have a formal sedevecantist position. It is that sedevecantism is dead wrong. They also are adamantly opposed to Feenyites. Interesting, I think. I am going to bed now. My wife has no pity on me when I stay up to late without some pressing reason. Oh well, she knew I was an insomniac before we got married. It runs in the family. God Bless!! Edited March 16, 2004 by popestpiusx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts