lilac_angel Posted March 13, 2004 Share Posted March 13, 2004 Does anyone have any links to webpages or any info denouncing SSPX and pointing out the problems with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phatcatholic Posted March 13, 2004 Share Posted March 13, 2004 a wealth of links and information can be found [b][url="http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ389.HTM"]here[/url][/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 14, 2004 Share Posted March 14, 2004 What you get on that sight is a mixed bad of links and articles. Some are quite good, others less so, still others have holes in them a mile wide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 14, 2004 Share Posted March 14, 2004 Furthurmore, dear lilac, if you are already convinced that the SSPX needs denouncing, I would hope that you have reasons for it. Just a thought. And for the record, I am not in any way shape or form affiliated with the SSPX. My namesake is the sainted Pope, not the society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcceNovaFacioOmni Posted March 14, 2004 Share Posted March 14, 2004 SSPX is a schismatic group, rejecting JP II, Vatican II, and the Novus Ordo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hananiah Posted March 14, 2004 Share Posted March 14, 2004 Here is a dialogue with a member of the SSPX. It demonstrates the errors of the SSPX position quite succinctly. [url="http://www.catholicintl.com/epologetics/DiscussionSSPX.asp"]http://www.catholicintl.com/epologetics/DiscussionSSPX.asp[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 thedude, Those are rather broad accusations. Care to elaborate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 (edited) hananiah, That is a most interesting link. One of the best I have seen. I share many (though not all) of the same concerns about the society as Mr. Sungenis. What I find to be nteresting though is that the Mark fellow does not accurately present the SSPX position on some of these matters. Even so, it is a good dialogue and I think Mr. Sungenis comes out ahead in the end. Edited March 15, 2004 by popestpiusx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vianney Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 I totally disagree with that debate. I think the Pope is wonderful and is an amazing man. They both bash the Pope and basically say he is not a good Pope, one of the worst in history etc etc....Shame on them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 vianney, What is being discussed is not their opinion of the pope but rather their argument over the legitimacy of the SSPX. Besiedes that, what Sungenis has problems with are not doctrinal statements, nor disciplinary norms, but rather purdential decisions made by the Holy Father. These are perfectly open to debate and ones disagreement with them does not make one a bad Catholic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilac_angel Posted March 15, 2004 Author Share Posted March 15, 2004 Thanks, everyone, for the info so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vianney Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 As it is true they are debating the differences between SSPX and Catholic Church they are still at the same time bashing the Pope. I would have to disagree with both of them and I think that the Pope is doing a wondeful job. I think he has guided the Church beautifully and I think the argument got disrespectful quick. A Koran Kisser??? The Anti Christ??? and they are not bashing the Pope? Shame on them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 [url="http://members.lycos.co.uk/jloughnan/index.htm"]http://members.lycos.co.uk/jloughnan/index.htm[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 This site is kind of a mess, but it's dedicated to this issue. [url="http://jloughnan.tripod.com/index.htm"]http://jloughnan.tripod.com/index.htm[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 haha, sorry cmom! we posted the same site, it just has two different URL's I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts