Apotheoun Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 As far as the world is concerned: [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idUp9_h3PYw&fmt=18"][u]It's Not Over[/u][/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Mr_Private_Person' post='1713214' date='Nov 28 2008, 07:41 PM']Why do you try to dismiss what I say by asking me if I am a title? I am a person, and I will ask you not to call me a name.[/quote] But if he calls you a "person" that is a name too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightofChrist Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Mr_Private_Person' post='1713214' date='Nov 28 2008, 10:41 PM']Why do you try to dismiss what I say by asking me if I am a title? I am a person, and I will ask you not to call me a name.[/quote] Yet, you've already given titles to Christians, Muslims, Jews, environmentalists, and "Religious fanatics." So again do you or do you not believe in God or a god(s)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Private_Person Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Apotheoun' post='1713222' date='Nov 28 2008, 10:45 PM']But if he calls you a "person" that is a name too.[/quote] person is a neutral term, atheist, especially in a theist message board, is an antagonist term that I would prefer not to be called because that is not who I am. Atheist, Catholic, and all these are titles that are not who we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Person is not a neutral term to some individuals. It is a metaphysically loaded term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpugh Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 ... Doug? Am I getting warm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightofChrist Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Mr_Private_Person' post='1713226' date='Nov 28 2008, 10:48 PM']person is a neutral term, atheist, especially in a theist message board, is an antagonist term that I would prefer not to be called because that is not who I am. Atheist, Catholic, and all these are titles that are not who we are.[/quote] "Religious fanatic" is also a antagonist term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Sacred Music Man' post='1713232' date='Nov 28 2008, 07:50 PM']... Doug?[/quote] Joe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Private_Person Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Apotheoun' post='1713231' date='Nov 28 2008, 10:50 PM']Person is not a neutral term to some individuals. It is a metaphysically loaded term.[/quote] I don't get too caught up in those high-minded philsophical man-made stuff. Men are so limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Person is not really a philosophical term; instead, it is a theological term. The whole concept originated in Christian theology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpugh Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 (edited) Hmm... @MPP Where are you going with this, man? Edited November 29, 2008 by Sacred Music Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximilianus Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 He's trying to enlightening us with his non-philosophical, philosophical pragmatism... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Private_Person Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Apotheoun' post='1713249' date='Nov 28 2008, 10:55 PM']Person is not really a philosophical term; instead, it is a theological term. The whole concept originated in Christian theology.[/quote] So, all other religions thought that nobody was a person? What did they believe, that we were one thing, and there was no individualism! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Mr_Private_Person' post='1713268' date='Nov 28 2008, 08:00 PM']So, all other religions thought that nobody was a person?[/quote] That is correct. Even Judaism only developed the concept after the rise of Christianity. [quote name='Mr_Private_Person' post='1713268' date='Nov 28 2008, 08:00 PM']What did they believe, that we were one thing, and there was no individualism![/quote] Most religions thought of man as a jumble of transitory elements or states of being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Private_Person Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 [quote name='Apotheoun' post='1713272' date='Nov 28 2008, 11:02 PM']That is correct. Even Judaism only developed the concept after the rise of Christianity. Most religions thought of man as a jumble of transitory elements or states of being.[/quote] Wow, a little bigoted aren't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now