Fr. Antony Maria OSB Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 I don't HAVE an imagination! what now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icelandic_iceskater Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 then they don't even exist imaginarily. At least in your life. What a shame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fr. Antony Maria OSB Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 no, because they are definately there! and since I don't have an imagination, they are factual! ha! I win! now you owe me a cookie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icelandic_iceskater Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 I see no lulz. I see the world lulz. But that doesn't mean they actually exist. I have no cookies... but I do have sour punch straws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fr. Antony Maria OSB Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 just because you don't see them doesn't mean that they don't exist: you need to have faith, young paduon! and I don't like sour things very much: you still owe me a cookie! a taco would be considered as a reputable substitute, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG45 Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 Lulz exist, many things exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icelandic_iceskater Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 [quote name='NazFarmer' post='1737145' date='Dec 28 2008, 09:10 PM']just because you don't see them doesn't mean that they don't exist: you need to have faith, young paduon![/quote] the lulz do not manifest themselves in any form, with the exception of silly peoples saying the word itself. I have no reason to believe in them. Here's a taco for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fr. Antony Maria OSB Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 thank you for the taco, but I stand by my previous statement: the lulz can indeed manifest themselves in many forms, one of which, as you rightly stated, is in the form of people saying the word itself. Therefore, by your own argumet, the lulz do exist! haHA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icelandic_iceskater Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 your welcome for the taco. You're off a little though... I could say that a nibletitsio exists. Does that mean it does? The made up word "nibletitsio" exists, does a nibletitsio exist? Debatable. In order for me to know that it exists I'm pretty sure that it would have to manifest itself in other ways. So- how else does the lulz manifest itself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kafka Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 as a universal. Plato and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selah Posted December 29, 2008 Author Share Posted December 29, 2008 spork Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icelandic_iceskater Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 [quote name='kafka' post='1737241' date='Dec 28 2008, 10:44 PM']as a universal. Plato and stuff.[/quote] pretty sure my Italian cousin has never heard of lulz yea. they don't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kafka Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 [quote name='icelandic_iceskater' post='1737306' date='Dec 28 2008, 10:28 PM']pretty sure my Italian cousin has never heard of lulz yea. they don't exist.[/quote] who said anything about "they" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpugh Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 Sporks are irrelevant. There is no lulz. Lullz is the proper spelling. lawl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kafka Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 [quote name='Sacred Music Man' post='1737461' date='Dec 29 2008, 12:44 AM']Sporks are irrelevant. There is no lulz. Lullz is the proper spelling. lawl.[/quote] is it in Webster's yet? yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now