Vincent Vega Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 Hello everyone, Came across this interesting article about a teacher at my school (!!) in the NY Times, and his struggle with teaching evolution. He is a supporter of evolutions and a faithful Anglican. Discuss. [url="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/education/24evolution.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hp"]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/educatio...amp;_r=1&hp[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 [quote name='USAirwaysIHS' post='1641976' date='Aug 29 2008, 09:51 PM']Hello everyone, Came across this interesting article about a teacher at my school (!!) in the NY Times, and his struggle with teaching evolution. He is a supporter of evolutions and a faithful Anglican. Discuss. [url="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/education/24evolution.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hp"]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/educatio...amp;_r=1&hp[/url][/quote] Yes. That this question could even be asked stuns me to be honest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted August 30, 2008 Author Share Posted August 30, 2008 Why does it stun you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldenchild17 Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 No. Not as scientific fact. Should students be made aware of it and what it entails? Sure, but they should not be led to believe it. No one can make someone believe something or disbelieve it, but teachers should not be putting this on the same pedestal as 1+1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pan!c139 Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 They should be aware of the theory because it's part of history, but not as a scientific fact, as goldenchild said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted August 30, 2008 Author Share Posted August 30, 2008 [quote name='goldenchild17' post='1642018' date='Aug 29 2008, 09:34 PM']No. Not as scientific fact. Should students be made aware of it and what it entails? Sure, but they should not be led to believe it. No one can make someone believe something or disbelieve it, but teachers should not be putting this on the same pedestal as 1+1[/quote] I think you'd be surprised as to the amount of supposed "fact" which has been discovered as false and the comparative amount of "theories" that have been proven so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MakeYouThink Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 (edited) Yes, because people have a right to believe in anything they choose to believe in. As long as it doesn't interfere in the rights of a person to believe in something without ridicule. Funny, an entire group of high school students having a book that shows where each part of a Biological text books assertions about Evolution might be wrong, and we're a minority! LOL! Edited August 30, 2008 by MakeYouThink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldenchild17 Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 [quote name='USAirwaysIHS' post='1642030' date='Aug 29 2008, 09:39 PM']I think you'd be surprised as to the amount of supposed "fact" which has been discovered as false and the comparative amount of "theories" that have been proven so...[/quote] I don't know how surprised I would be. But all I'm saying is that something shouldn't be purported to be something that it hasn't been proven to be (i.e. Evolution as a scientific fact) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted August 30, 2008 Author Share Posted August 30, 2008 [quote name='goldenchild17' post='1642047' date='Aug 29 2008, 10:45 PM']I don't know how surprised I would be. But all I'm saying is that something shouldn't be purported to be something that it hasn't been proven to be (i.e. Evolution as a scientific fact)[/quote] Gravity hasn't been proven to be fact. It, after all, is still the Theory of Gravity. Should teachers teaching it also let their class know that it's not a "proven fact" when teaching it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 [quote name='USAirwaysIHS' post='1642009' date='Aug 29 2008, 09:32 PM']Why does it stun you?[/quote] The Origin of Species, itself an extraordinarily cogent argument for Darwinism was published in 1859, it is now 2008. Our entire scientific knowledge of biology, pharmaceuticals, and zoology is based on evolution. There is such a plethora of evidence that evolution is absolutely correct that is boggles the mind. I suppose what stuns me is that, no offense, so many people could be so astonishingly ignorant. It’s not like are live in the backwoods of Vietnam, Americans have such an astonishing amount of information available to them, and they waste it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted August 30, 2008 Author Share Posted August 30, 2008 It sometimes puzzles me that people deny it, yes, but I don't know why it would stun you that the question would be posed for discussion's sake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 [quote name='pan!c139' post='1642026' date='Aug 29 2008, 09:38 PM']They should be aware of the theory because it's part of history, but not as a scientific fact, as goldenchild said.[/quote] Nothing in science is a "fact" as you seem to be thinking of the term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldenchild17 Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 [quote name='USAirwaysIHS' post='1642051' date='Aug 29 2008, 09:47 PM']Gravity hasn't been proven to be fact. It, after all, is still the Theory of Gravity. Should teachers teaching it also let their class know that it's not a "proven fact" when teaching it?[/quote] I should have clarified. I'm not using the word "theory" in the scientific sense. In the scientific terminology of course a theory holds far more weight than it does in the general sense. A scientific theory is far more authoritative than a theory that I were to come up with. I'm referring to evolution as a theory in the latter sense while gravity of course would be a theory in the former sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
princessgianna Posted August 31, 2008 Share Posted August 31, 2008 (edited) the only problem i have with evolution being taught is it is being taught as if it were a law and it is a THEORY! There are several holes still like if we were at one point little dust particles flying in space where did those dust particules come from??? And If we did evolved from monkeys why do we still have monkeys??? Edited August 31, 2008 by princessgianna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted August 31, 2008 Share Posted August 31, 2008 [quote name='princessgianna' post='1643118' date='Aug 30 2008, 11:02 PM']the only problem i have with evolution being taught is it is being taught as if it were a law and it is a THEORY! There are several holes still like if we were at one point little dust particles flying in space where did those dust particules come from??? And If we did evolved from monkeys why do we still have monkeys???[/quote] Do you even have a functioning understand of what the theory of evolution actually is? No offense, but it sounds like you don't. Kind of silly for you to be making judgments based on your personal ideas rather than scientific evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now