kujo Posted June 10, 2008 Author Share Posted June 10, 2008 (edited) [quote name='Justin86' post='1566418' date='Jun 10 2008, 04:32 AM']You'd be wrong. The exact number is 41 according to this site. [url="http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/Supreme_Court/justices/nopriorexp.html"]http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/Supreme_Cour...nopriorexp.html[/url][/quote] I stand corrected. She's not gonna get it, though. She'll be older than 60 when he'd even get the nomination and usually Presidents like to nominate younger SC Justices so their legacy (the Prez's) will continue for decades to follow. Edited June 10, 2008 by kujo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin86 Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Yeah, I don't think she's a serious contender for the job either, but it is a strange rumor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now