smeagol Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 for an in-class debate in my health class, i was selected to represent the 'pro' side of legalizing marijuana. what do you guys think of this issue ? especially the comparison to the failure of prohibition in the 1920s; the research that claims that marijuana is not nearly as harmful as the legal drugs of alcohol and tobacco; and that jails are crowding and other police resources are being drained; or that recreation use harms no one. your thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foundsheep Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 Thats what we need, add mure intoxicated driving deaths along with alcohol. If its not medicanol stop smokin and get in the confessional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.SIGGA Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 I'm not for legalizing it, but the mandatory penalties in narcotics convictions are way too severe, like greater than rape and even murder in some cases. Personally I think alcohol is way more dangerous when abused. The Canadian alternative might be a suggestion you want to use for your paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smeagol Posted February 27, 2004 Author Share Posted February 27, 2004 what is the Can alt ? is that just to decriminalize a small amount of possession ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 Although I don’t smoke hash any more, I have to take up the pro stand point: 1. It’s no more intoxicating than alcohol – although I agree it does impair driving ability. However, the US tried banning alcohol once and it didn’t work, you’ve probably got as many high drivers out there now as there would be if it were legal. 2. Pretty much anyone who want’s to smoke hash now does anyway (at least that’s the case in the UK). Authorities should just decriminalise it and get on with solving the bigger drug problem. I don’t agree with this rationale extending to harder drugs or other crimes. The decision has to be a balance between the cost of policing now versus the physical and social effects of the crime. 3. We hear it commonly said that “It leads to harder drugs”. Well, yes, it can but only if you want it to. In my opinion, someone who wants to smoke crack will anyway, not just because they got into hash first. I think it actually works the other way around – you’ve got hash smoker that smoke it recreationally and hash smokers that use it when they can’t get the harder drug they’re used to. 4. People drunk on alcohol get noisy and aggressive (just look at any major city centre on a weekend night). People stoned on hash giggle, eat mars bars then fall asleep (if they’re unlucky, they’ll get a bit paranoid too!) 5. In the book of Genesis it says something like “I give to you all of the seed bearing plants to use”. Hash in its pure form is a dried herb so who are we to argue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smeagol Posted February 27, 2004 Author Share Posted February 27, 2004 thanks for your input. and Richard, your last point made me think of a bumper sticker slogan: Man made beer. God made weed. Whom do you trust? (well, it said "who" instead of "whom" but still ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 God made weed. Man made weed-smoking. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cathgirl Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 I don't think we should, b/c if we do, it could never really become illegal again. (like you could never make alcohol illegal). We have enought legal substances that aren't good for your body, remember our bodies are Temples of God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrie Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 Although I don’t smoke hash any more, I have to take up the pro stand point: 1. It’s no more intoxicating than alcohol – although I agree it does impair driving ability. However, the US tried banning alcohol once and it didn’t work, you’ve probably got as many high drivers out there now as there would be if it were legal. 2. Pretty much anyone who want’s to smoke hash now does anyway (at least that’s the case in the UK). Authorities should just decriminalise it and get on with solving the bigger drug problem. I don’t agree with this rationale extending to harder drugs or other crimes. The decision has to be a balance between the cost of policing now versus the physical and social effects of the crime. 3. We hear it commonly said that “It leads to harder drugs”. Well, yes, it can but only if you want it to. In my opinion, someone who wants to smoke crack will anyway, not just because they got into hash first. I think it actually works the other way around – you’ve got hash smoker that smoke it recreationally and hash smokers that use it when they can’t get the harder drug they’re used to. 4. People drunk on alcohol get noisy and aggressive (just look at any major city centre on a weekend night). People stoned on hash giggle, eat mars bars then fall asleep (if they’re unlucky, they’ll get a bit paranoid too!) 5. In the book of Genesis it says something like “I give to you all of the seed bearing plants to use”. Hash in its pure form is a dried herb so who are we to argue? I've got to agree with Richard. Those points are excellent. If we're worried about driving high, make laws, just like drunk driving laws. But lots of people use it for medicine or recreationally and are safe about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PedroX Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 Marijuana is worse for your body that Alcohol or tobacco. The physical effect on the body is 20 times that of smoking tobacco. In other words, smoking one joint is physically the same as smoking a whole pack of cigarettes. Thats all, carry on. peace... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seatbelt Blue Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 To which I reply, it's the rare user who smokes an entire joint alone. It's puff-puff-pass, puff-puff-pass, puff-puff-pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carrie Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 To which I reply, it's the rare user who smokes an entire joint alone. It's puff-puff-pass, puff-puff-pass, puff-puff-pass. Also on top on sharing it, most recreational users don't smoke everyday. Maybe once a week or once every two weeks, where the average smoker smokes at least a half pack (if not more) a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.SIGGA Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 what is the Can alt ? is that just to decriminalize a small amount of possession ? yeah, that's the idea. a misdemeanor carries the same weight as a traffic ticket, but repeated offenses lead to bigger punishments. Convictions don't carry the life sentences anymore either. it has also decreased the number of violent deaths/offenses associated with marijauna drug traffic but that's according to "TrueLife" on MTV. This makes sense because since the law passed more people just grow their own hash now, but this is becoming a big problem for people in America who are buying and selling Canadian weed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmjtina Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 you know, I associate marijuana not with "recreational, puff puff pass, smoke less than a pack a day" illusion, but with rage, murder, obsessive, addicted, sinful horrific things. Yeah, and I'm from the barrio, so most of these people don't worry about getting caught and put in jail......only when it leads to murder. Pray for all those who are slaves to this sin as well as others. And don't give me the "that's not everybody" statement, because I've got my youth group pressured to take drugs and this argument is shot. I wouldn't base any judgement on what MTV shows as "true". MTV is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 i think the gov't should legalize it, then tax it so much (kinda like they're doing with cigarettes) and make money off of it. Look, if they're using gambling as a way of funding gov't programs, why shouldn't they do the same with pot and alcohol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now