foundsheep Posted February 24, 2004 Share Posted February 24, 2004 I know Dr. Hahn throuh a friend too! He's a neat guy. So you see he is a sedvacantist. But regardless of if he is or isn't, that's not really my point. My point is to ask you all how you know the sedvacantists are wrong and you are right. I was just using Mel as an example. Is it faith in itself or is there something more? What your not understanding is Mel still Believes in everthing Pre Vatican II. Which is everything traditional about being Catholic and where it came from ie the History,who gave you the bible and Real Presence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dairygirl4u2c Posted February 24, 2004 Author Share Posted February 24, 2004 After Clement V died, there was a two-year, three-and-a-half month period during which there was no pope. John XXII was finally elected to the papacy, but damage to the respect for the papacy resulted from such a long vacancy. That is what I am basing my question on. Now we'll argue over it's verocity then we'll probably settle it as true. Then you'll prolly say that you believe that the Pope is the Pope because his record is so long and you just have faith that it is the pope. So now. I know there is a guy that claims to be Pope at a apostate church around where I live. The pope from there doesn't live there, it's just a church. Do any of you know who I am talking about? And if you do, why is he necessarily not the Pope? I will look this up later but I have an exam in one of my classes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hananiah Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 You mean this guy? http://www.truecatholic.org/pope/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now