Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Fatal Error, Limit Of Allocation, Cannot Open...

cmotherofpirl

By cmotherofpirl
in Catholic Open Mic

 Share

Recommended Posts

Laudate_Dominum

Laudate_Dominum

Posted
Posted

[quote name='alicemary' post='1433140' date='Dec 12 2007, 01:35 AM']Several times this week I have been unable to get onto the phorum at all. Have gotten error messages, and logged off and tried again, and usually got in on my second try. Lunar eclipse?[/quote]
I'm starting to entertain the paranoid idea that it is Catholic hating hackers who are attacking the site and bogging it down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Laudate_Dominum

Laudate_Dominum

Posted
Posted

[quote name='notardillacid' post='1433146' date='Dec 12 2007, 01:40 AM']I think dUSt was probably just trying out his prototype quantum computer and the gov got wind and shut his op down.[/quote]
lol, that would be sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rachael

rachael

Posted
Posted (edited)

could it also be the reason that we also end up posting the same things two or three times?

:twitch:

Edited by rachael
Link to comment
Share on other sites
goldenchild17

goldenchild17

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Laudate_Dominum' post='1433102' date='Dec 11 2007, 10:11 PM']Web apps are usually bloatware imho. There are probably loads of redundant datasets floating around at any given moment in IPB. I have little sympathy for applications that use memory frivolously. I just wrote a program (a vast galactic map editor for my goofy game) that allows one to view a representation of a region 1,600 light years in diameter (~15,137,168,756,129,280 km) and zoom in, in real time, to a subsection on the level of 189,214,609,451,616 km (20 ly) and then way down to 16,000,000,000 km in diameter, continuing from here one can zoom in (again, seamlessly and in real time) to a region with detail down to 0.02 km. The data structures that model this incredibly insane amount of space typically take about 1.6 MB of system memory at any given time and this includes a wide variety of metadata necessary to render all the details (tons of stars, planetary systems, nebulae, et cetera). I will admit that I've spent an inordinate amount of time achieving this degree of optimization, but my point is that where there is a will there is a way and more often than not these days developers are so obsessed with "RAD" development (RAD = rapid application development) that the art of truly optimal coding is forgotten.[/quote]
:nerd: :bow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
goldenchild17

goldenchild17

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Laudate_Dominum' post='1433102' date='Dec 11 2007, 10:11 PM']Web apps are usually bloatware imho. There are probably loads of redundant datasets floating around at any given moment in IPB. I have little sympathy for applications that use memory frivolously. I just wrote a program (a vast galactic map editor for my goofy game) that allows one to view a representation of a region 1,600 light years in diameter (~15,137,168,756,129,280 km) and zoom in, in real time, to a subsection on the level of 189,214,609,451,616 km (20 ly) and then way down to 16,000,000,000 km in diameter, continuing from here one can zoom in (again, seamlessly and in real time) to a region with detail down to 0.02 km. The data structures that model this incredibly insane amount of space typically take about 1.6 MB of system memory at any given time and this includes a wide variety of metadata necessary to render all the details (tons of stars, planetary systems, nebulae, et cetera). I will admit that I've spent an inordinate amount of time achieving this degree of optimization, but my point is that where there is a will there is a way and more often than not these days developers are so obsessed with "RAD" development (RAD = rapid application development) that the art of truly optimal coding is forgotten.[/quote]
:nerd: :bow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thy Geekdom Come

Thy Geekdom Come

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Luthien' post='1433224' date='Dec 12 2007, 08:22 AM']Ain't he somethin' else? :love:

:topsy:[/quote]
Nerd-lover!

That's okay, I got me a nerd-lover, too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
IcePrincessKRS

IcePrincessKRS

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Laudate_Dominum' post='1433105' date='Dec 12 2007, 12:24 AM']In the meantime I speculate that switching to linear mode may make it possible to view a thread that gives this error. I think standard mode involves some extra recursion and linear mode may not push things over the top. Just a theory anyway. And there is always the lo-fi version.[/quote]


Switching to outline mode (which I hate and think is ugly) does allow me to read and post in all threads. Lo-fi only allows one to read, not post and reply. So, I take ugly over errors and pray that it gets fixed soon. Linear still seems to be giving me errors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ardillacid

ardillacid

Posted
Posted

[quote name='hot stuff' post='1433761' date='Dec 13 2007, 10:16 AM']I'm a genius[/quote]
[img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y218/blink822/th_puker.gif[/img]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaime

Jaime

Posted
Posted

[quote name='notardillacid' post='1433769' date='Dec 13 2007, 10:22 AM'][img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y218/blink822/th_puker.gif[/img][/quote]

Puke if you want

I fixed it

Bask in my awesomeness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...