ruso Posted November 15, 2007 Share Posted November 15, 2007 It's just a start, but the dialogue between Catholics and Orthodox beginning to give results. I don't see a reunification, but the relations improved. Link to Vatican. [url="http://212.77.1.245/news_services/press/vis/dinamiche/e0_en.htm"]http://212.77.1.245/news_services/press/vi...miche/e0_en.htm[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpugh Posted November 15, 2007 Share Posted November 15, 2007 Wow, this is great news. Glad this is all happening... will we make progress though? Maybe... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dairygirl4u2c Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 it seems they've been having "talks" for ever. then people get happy about it as progress. then nothing then talks then nothing then talks. i wouldn't be surprised if it's both sides just thinking, "we'll convert them"... or "this is pointless but we'll do it cause it's the nice thing to do". maybe there's some hints towards genuiness and i'm too cynical. with the info access we got today, i'm sure the pepole high enough to engage in tehse talks have heard it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaHilarious Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 [quote name='dairygirl4u2c' post='1420057' date='Nov 15 2007, 07:17 PM']it seems they've been having "talks" for ever. then people get happy about it as progress. then nothing then talks then nothing then talks. i wouldn't be surprised if it's both sides just thinking, "we'll convert them"... or "this is pointless but we'll do it cause it's the nice thing to do". maybe there's some hints towards genuiness and i'm too cynical. with the info access we got today, i'm sure the pepole high enough to engage in tehse talks have heard it all.[/quote] i think you might be too cynical. the Catholic/Orthodox dialogue really isn't one of "converting" each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faithfulrock3r Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 sounds like the cardinal is downplaying it, but isn't this rather huge? one of the major differences between the EO and the Catholic Church is the primacy of the pope, and this would seem to be a major step in the direction of reconciliation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 the reason it's downplayed is because it isn't really all that major; the East has always basically conceded the role of the Pope to be "first among equals" and this seems to be something along those lines. maybe it's more of an opening for the role of that "first among equals" being closer to what the papacy says it is... hard to tell, otherwise, they're just making clear something which was already basically held by both sides... there was never any dispute, that I know of, that in a united East-West Church, the Pope would take his place among the other patriarchs as "first among equals". since they see the Roman Church as schisming from them, the Patriarch of Constantinople has assumed that role, though I think Moscow has always wanted it as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 There is at least one Orthodox Christian who loves il papa. [img]http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h119/NoonienSoong_2006/orthodox20boy20kisses20popes20hand.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 That picture reminds me of Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country for no particular reason. "[i]If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it[/i]." "[i]Don't let it end this way, captain...[/i]" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin86 Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 I tend to think their isn't going to be any reunification with the Orthodox Church until the laity from both the Latin and the Eastern Churches in communion with us, lay down their pride and join the priesthood. The schism is over something real. John Paul II often spoke of the hope of reunification by the year 2000. Sadly his dreams were not realized, but I do believe that by the end of this century all Christians will be united under Rome--including Protestants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 2054, anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin86 Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Should that year mean something to me, lol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 exactly 1000 years from the first schism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkwright Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 [quote name='Aloysius' post='1422068' date='Nov 19 2007, 09:48 AM']exactly 1000 years from the first schism [/quote] 1000 years seemingly would heal any wound... But some people have long memories Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LouisvilleFan Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 [quote name='Justin86' post='1421629' date='Nov 18 2007, 06:31 PM']The schism is over something real. John Paul II often spoke of the hope of reunification by the year 2000. Sadly his dreams were not realized, but I do believe that by the end of this century all Christians will be united under Rome--including Protestants.[/quote] Not to be a pessimist, but I'm really not even sure that's possible. When in history have all Christians been united? I think Gnosticism starting to spring up before 100 AD. While unity would be awesome, at the same time, the Church is going to pass away with the rest of this world after Christ returns. I don't expect true unity to happen any sooner, but at least we can take joy in knowing God will make it happen eventually. [quote name='Aloysius' post='1422033' date='Nov 19 2007, 09:14 AM']2054, anyone?[/quote] A former Protestant convert to Orthodoxy I talked to once said the same thing, that as we approach the millenial anniversary of the Schism he expects a great emphasis on achieving reunification. Of course, the events leading to the Great Schism began building in the 3rd and 4th centuries with the tensions that already existed between the East and West also being manifested in the Church. The Schism just made it official. It's definitely a long road, and this is far from the first time that reunification has been attempted, but giving up is certainly not an option. A lot of fruit can come from talks, even if the ultimate goal isn't realized in our lifetimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpugh Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 I remember a source given somewhere here on PM saying the schism wasn't really in 1054. It was more along the lines of 1500s when it finally "Happened". Meh, I'll go with 2054. But I don't its a time where we "talk" about reunification. Talk is cheap by then. It's gotta be happening now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now