Justification By Faith Alone

[Ziggamafu]

[quote name='reyb' post='1728411' date='Dec 15 2008, 03:41 PM'][indent]Let us start from here (again) And pardon me for being stupid.
You said in post #86

[color="#0000FF"]At this point then, I would like to paste in another post of mine from another thread. The intent of the post is to demonstrate that the Catholic Church is the one and only source and standard of all religious truth; that is, Catholicism is the only absolutely true religion and Catholicism alone represents the revelation and intentions of the true God. Yes, truth is found in other religions. No, that does not make them true. Yes, God reaches people in other religions. No, that does not mean that he is okay with them staying those[b] false religions[/b].[/color]
--------------------
What is that false religion you are saying? Just give me an example.[/indent][/quote]

Any and every religion besides the Catholic religion. Hinduism, for example.

If you disagree with something in my post, please be honest and up front about it. You have once again diverted focus from either of the two points you originally wanted to discuss (historicity of Christ and sola scriptura) and randomly shifted into a discussion on religious plurality / relativism. No. Get back on track.

[reyb]

[quote name='Ziggamafu' post='1728436' date='Dec 15 2008, 04:23 PM']Any and every religion besides the Catholic religion. Hinduism, for example.

If you disagree with something in my post, please be honest and up front about it. You have once again diverted focus from either of the two points you originally wanted to discuss (historicity of Christ and sola scriptura) and randomly shifted into a discussion on religious plurality / relativism. No. Get back on track.[/quote]
[indent]No I will not run from our topic. Do not worry. We will focus on what you said above. Therefore, only the Catholic Church is the True Church of God and the rest are all false Churches or false religion. Is it correct?[/indent]

[Ziggamafu]

Reyb. Are you kidding me? Seriously???

The topic is either

a) sola scriptura

or

b) historicity of Christ as a preface to sola scriptura

Although I don't see the point in debating "b" if we both agree that the NT is historically reliable.

[Guest]

[quote name='Ziggamafu' post='1728600' date='Dec 15 2008, 05:44 PM']Reyb. Are you kidding me? Seriously???

The topic is either

a) sola scriptura

or

b) historicity of Christ as a preface to sola scriptura

Although I don't see the point in debating "b" if we both agree that the NT is historically reliable.[/quote]

this is funny

[Ziggamafu]

I'm just going to be up front about this.

Reyb, I am giving you one final chance to engage in an honest debate. If your next post attempts to disprove an assertion of one of my previous posts regarding either the historicity of Christ or sola scriptura then I will address it. If you do not, then I will assume you to be incapable of any honest disagreement and our conversation will be over.

[Ziggamafu]

[quote name='Delivery Boy' post='1728626' date='Dec 15 2008, 05:55 PM']this is funny[/quote]

I'm laughing on the inside. Deep, deep, inside.
You know. Underneath all the layers of annoyance and frustration.

[Galloglasses' Alt]

Thats how I felt the first time Reyb came round the debate table.

[reyb]

[quote name='Ziggamafu' post='1728600' date='Dec 15 2008, 05:44 PM']Reyb. Are you kidding me? Seriously???

The topic is either

a) sola scriptura

or

b) historicity of Christ as a preface to sola scriptura

Although I don't see the point in debating "b" if we both agree that the NT is historically reliable.[/quote]

[indent]Okay. let us discuss b. [/indent]

Edited December 15, 2008 by reyb