Hilary Clinton Uses Photo Of Herself With Mother Teresa

[Didymus]

I'm sure she's proud of it, but you can't possibly watch that vid and tell me the pic isn't in there to make Hilary look like a non-partisan saint.

[Guest T-Bone]

[quote name='Luthien' post='1276180' date='May 17 2007, 07:47 PM']Could that be considered slander?[/quote]

Legally, no. Morally, yes.

[Guest T-Bone]

[quote name='catholicinsd' post='1276196' date='May 17 2007, 08:07 PM']Perhaps Mrs. Clinton is proud of meeting Mother. Ever thought of that?[/quote]

Perhaps Mother didn't consent for her image to be used as an implied endorsement for a pro-abortion American political candidate. Ever thought of that?

[catholicinsd]

Than why did she allow for her photographed to be taken?

[Guest T-Bone]

[quote name='catholicinsd' post='1276272' date='May 17 2007, 09:10 PM']Than why did she allow for her photographed to be taken?[/quote]

Two people can attend an event, meet each other, and be photographed without agreeing with each other's politics.

[img]http://www.666mark-of-the-beast.org/images/benitomussolini.jpg[/img]

In this picture, Benito Mussolini reads his credentials prior to signing the Lateran Treaty on behalf of King Victor Emmanuel III. Cardinal Gasparri (seated), signed on behalf of Pope Pius XI.

[img]http://library.educationworld.net/txt15/missouri.jpg[/img]

Gen. MacArthur and Foreign Minister Mamoru Shigemitsu and Gen. Yoshijiro Umezu

Edited May 18, 2007 by T-Bone

[Guest T-Bone]

[img]http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/pope/bio/...pope.castro.jpg[/img]
[url="http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/pope/bio/papal/link.pope.castro.jpg"]http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/pope/bio/...pope.castro.jpg[/url]


[img]http://img.timeinc.net/time/2002/bhm/histo...mages/jesse.jpg[/img]
[url="http://img.timeinc.net/time/2002/bhm/history/images/jesse.jpg"]http://img.timeinc.net/time/2002/bhm/histo...mages/jesse.jpg[/url]

Edited May 18, 2007 by T-Bone

[Guest T-Bone]

[img]http://img.timeinc.net/time/2002/bhm/histo...mages/jesse.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/pope/bio/...pope.castro.jpg[/img]

[Lil Red]

[quote name='T-Bone' post='1276265' date='May 17 2007, 09:01 PM']Perhaps Mother didn't consent for her image to be used as an implied endorsement for a pro-abortion American political candidate. Ever thought of that?[/quote]
there must be an estate that controls her image, dontcha think?

[Guest T-Bone]

[quote]Out of respect to Mother Teresa, and the Missionaries of Charity strict guidelines for the use of Mother's image, we call on the Hillary Clinton campaign to immediately remove her image from their campaign video.[/quote]

[Ash Wednesday]

Imagine Castro using that picture of himself and the pope for his campaign. I'm sure as a Pole who lived under communism, JP2 would have [i]loved[/i] that.

Edited May 18, 2007 by Ash Wednesday

[Guest T-Bone]

But it's A-OK in catholicinSD's book.

[homeschoolmom]

Catholicinsd-- I want to make your position on this clear. You are suggesting that by posing with Hillary Clinton, Mother Teresa endorsed her politics. This is what you are suggesting when you said, "Then why did she allow for her photograph to be taken?" The implication is that the rest of that statement is "if she didn't agree/endorse Hillary's politics." A person as noted at Mother Teresa really doesn't have any control of who takes her picture or how they are used. The National Inquirer could take that picture and splash it on their front page with "MOTHER TERESA SUPPORTED HILLARY!" on it. Would that make it true? Of course not.

How can you take the words of Mother Teresa that I have quoted above and suggest that posing with someone is an endorsement of their politics. You are as bad as Budge.

[homeschoolmom]

[quote name='T-Bone' post='1276265' date='May 17 2007, 11:01 PM']Perhaps Mother didn't consent for her image to be used as an implied endorsement for a pro-abortion American political candidate. Ever thought of that?[/quote]


[quote name='catholicinsd' post='1276272' date='May 17 2007, 11:10 PM']Than why did she allow for her photographed to be taken?[/quote]

[catholicinsd]

Why do ya'll feel a need to jump on Mrs. Clinton's back with everything she has done in the last 20 years? Isn't ours a church of love?

And you Right-Wingers will always have Dan Quayle.

[homeschoolmom]

[quote name='catholicinsd' post='1276442' date='May 18 2007, 09:21 AM']Why do ya'll feel a need to jump on Mrs. Clinton's back with everything she has done in the last 20 years? Isn't ours a church of love?

And you Right-Wingers will always have Dan Quayle.[/quote]
That is your comeback? Seriously?

Of course we are going to look at Clinton's past. We are going to scrutinize her time as First Lady and the agenda she was pushing at that time. We will look at her voting record as senator... Yes, that's what voters should do. Of course our Church espouses love. Hillary Clinton, however, does not. You have the mistaken idea that somehow Hilary Clinton is a victim being picked on. She is not. She is a candidate for one of the most powerful positions in the world. In an effort to gain that position, Clinton is trying to distance herself from her left-wing radical pro abortion past. She has not changed her view on abortion, but she wants people to believe that she is moderate. She's not.

What is it about Hilary Clinton that you love so much that you are willing to look the other way when it comes to abortion?