dairygirl4u2c Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 do unto others as you'd have them do unto you.... what does this mean really? i do tend to over analyze things, but i don't think this is necessarily clear. i don't want others to stop me from doing certain things. subjectively, anyways. objectively though, if i am doing something wrong, i want others to stop me. so, with others, as i'd want to be treated, do i cater to their objective or the subjective person? i think i may need to get into hypothetical situations to figure out if i'm way off making this complicated, but i'd like your thoughts too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 I say cater to their objective realities, not their subjective ones. A good Christian (to whom this command is addressed) would want to be in touch with reality and doing good according to objective reality no matter what. Therefore, as he would want to be corrected, so should he correct others. I wouldn't want to be corrected by being yelled at or smacked upside the head (well, actually, there are situations in which a slap upside the head would be justified and I'd want someone to do it, so I won't rule that out as a possibility, but you know what I mean)... therefore I should go about correcting others the way I would want to be corrected when I am in error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katholikos Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 (edited) [quote]do unto others as you'd have them do unto you.... what does this mean really? i do tend to over analyze things, but i don't think this is necessarily clear.[/quote] It's kinda like knowing what the definition of "is" is. Likos Edited May 12, 2007 by Katholikos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethos Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 I believe this refers more to an external action. The statement encompasses all sins, since sin by nature is harmful. Hence if you do unto other what you would want done to you, sin would be absent in your life (i.e. gossip, fighting, ect, ect). Regarding your issue I believe it is vital to offer help to someone, even if they are not asking for it. For example, I have a friend who is an alcoholic, I did not accuse him of this or tell him that he must seek treatment. I simply told him that their is an alternative and when he is ready to call me. By not judging you are leaving the door open and through dedicatory prayers, Christ will lead him to the threshold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dairygirl4u2c Posted May 14, 2007 Author Share Posted May 14, 2007 I can sort of see stopping them from their objective sin. But, they also have a right to sin, I think, so maybe we shouldn't go for the objective stopping, or else we'd be outlawing all sins.. Plus, I can see objectively someone should want help, but subjectively they don't. I'd think the subjective person is what should be more clearly catered to, because it's just something extra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now