the_rev Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 When we pray the our father during mass, some people extend there arms, what does it mean, are they doing htis as a sense of being open to god? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 The orantes position. I think some people do it as a sign of community (the ones I see who usually hold hands during the Our Father do the whole arms outstretched position like the priest when there is no one around them) I dont really know any significance to it outside of that. I personally dont do it, because I think there should be that difference between us as the congregation, and what the priest is doing on the altar. Plus, as Catholics, I dont think we need something to signify our unity during the mass, as we have the Eucharist to do that, not symbolically, but actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneybags Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Nearly everyone in my area extends joined arms at the Our Father in the orantes position. I refuse to do thusly. [quote]HOLDING HANDS AT THE OUR FATHER? Answered by Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy at the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical Athenaeum. The argument from silence is not very strong, however, because while there is no particular difficulty in a couple, family or a small group spontaneously holding hands during the Our Father,[b]a problem arises when the entire assembly is expected or obliged to do so[/b]. [url="http://www.ewtn.com/library/Liturgy/zlitur10.htm"]http://www.ewtn.com/library/Liturgy/zlitur10.htm[/url][/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of the Holy Rosary Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Yeah...it's one thing to do it, but to pressure others too is just rude. I once attended a Mass at a parish where they took there hand-holding seriously. Immediately, I closed my eyes and folded my hands and somebody actually slapped my arm and said, with a reprimanding tone, 'we hold hands at this parish'. I just kept my eyes closed and pretended I didn't feel or hear anything. That's not cool... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 knight, that is definitely not cool i usually fold my hands in prayer in front of me. i've had people try to take my hand, or shake my shoulder to get my attention, but i just pretend i don't feel anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sojourner Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I usually fold my hands in front of me and look ahead during the Our Father. I really can't say the last time I held hands then ... it's been a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissScripture Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 If all else fails, sneezing or coughing into your hand seems to work to get them to leave you alone. Although, at the sign of peace, you can't touch anyone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissyP89 Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I never noticed it before last week, actually. I think it's really cool when couples do it, but I'd be weird about it if somebody grabbed me (or reprimanded me--that's just not cool). Before coming home to the Church, I went to a non-denominational fellowship group at my high school...they're fond of hand-holding. It creeped me out. Then again, I got all weird when a stranger hugged me during the sign of peace last week, too. Maybe that's just me. I'm big on personal space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_rev Posted April 30, 2007 Author Share Posted April 30, 2007 I'm not even talking about hand holding. I'm just curious what the reasoning behind an individual having there arms outstretched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 [quote name='Knight of the Holy Rosary' post='1260005' date='Apr 29 2007, 09:08 PM']Yeah...it's one thing to do it, but to pressure others too is just rude. I once attended a Mass at a parish where they took there hand-holding seriously. Immediately, I closed my eyes and folded my hands and somebody actually slapped my arm and said, with a reprimanding tone, 'we hold hands at this parish'. I just kept my eyes closed and pretended I didn't feel or hear anything. That's not cool...[/quote] just tell them to go to hell (j/k ) but there was this one time I was in high school in some kinda youth choir and the girl next to me joined hands with the others and noticed I didnt 'join in.' After mass I was jokin around. I was like 'as much as i would like to hold your hand, I dont do that whole thing' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maria Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 (edited) [quote name='http://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/orans_posture.htm']The following explains the origin of the Orans position, in which the priest intercedes during the liturgy on behalf of all. In the last couple decades this posture of praying with hands extended and lifted upwards has become a popular prayer posture for many laity, especially in the Charismatic Renewal. The Orans position (Latin for "praying") or some variation of it, was common to almost all ancient religions as an outward sign of supplicating God (or if a pagan religion, the gods). Consider what we do when we plead with someone. We might put our arms out in front of us as if reaching for the person and say "I beg you, help me." This seems to be a natural human gesture coming from deep within us - like kneeling to adore or to express sorrow. Now, turn that reach heavenwards and you have the Orans position. The ancient monuments of Christianity, such as the tombs in the catecombs, often show someone in the Orans position supplicating God, to show that the prayers of the Church accompany the person in death. The liturgical use of this position by the priest is spelled out in the rubrics (the laws governing how the Mass is said). It indicates his praying on BEHALF of us, acting as alter Christus as pastor of the flock, head of the body. It used to be minutely defined in the rubrics, which now say only, "extends his hands" or "with hands extended." Priests understand what is meant (from observation and training), and although there is some variability between priests basically the same gesture is obtained from all of them by these words. In the rubrics the Orans gesture is asked principally of the Main Celebrant, but on those occasions where either a priestly action is done (Eucharistic Prayer) or prayer in common (Our Father) all the concelebrants do it. It is never done by the Deacon, who does not represent the People before God but assists him who does. Among the laity this practice began with the charismatic renewal. Used in private prayer it has worked its way into the Liturgy. It is a legitimate gesture to use when praying, as history shows, however, it is a private gesture when used in the Mass and in some cases conflicts with the system of signs which the rubrics are intended to protect. The Mass is not a private or merely human ceremony. The symbology of the actions, including such gestures, is definite and precise, and reflects the sacramental character of the Church's prayer. As the Holy See has recently pointed out, confusion has entered the Church about the hierarchical nature of her worship, and this gesture certainly contributes to that confusion when it conflicts with the ordered sign language of the Mass. Lets take each case. Our Father. The intention for lay people using the Orans position at this time is, I suppose, that we pray Our Father, and the unity of people and priest together is expressed by this common gesture of prayer. Although this gesture is not called for in the rubrics, it does at least seem, on the surface, to not be in conflict with the sacramental sign system at the point when we pray Our Father. I say on the surface, however, since while lay people are doing this the deacon, whose postures are governed by the rubrics, may not do it. So, we have the awkward disunity created by the priest making an appropriate liturgical gesture in accordance with the rubrics, the deacon not making the same gesture in accordance with the rubrics, some laity making the same gesture as the priest not in accordance with the rubrics, and other laity not making the gesture (for various reasons, including knowing it is not part of their liturgical role). In the end, the desire of the Church for liturgical unity is defeated. After Our Father. This liturgical disunity continues after the Our Father when some, though not all, who assumed the Orans position during the Our Father continue it through the balance of the prayers, until after "For thine is the kingdom etc." The rubrics provide that priest-concelebrants lower their extended hands, so that the main celebrant alone continues praying with hands extended, since he represents all, including his brother priests. So, we have the very anomalous situation that no matter how many clergy are present only one of them is praying with hands extended, accompanied by numbers of the laity. So, while we shouldn't attribute bad will to those who honestly have felt that there was some virtue in doing this during the Mass, it is yet another case where good will can achieve the opposite of what it intends when not imbued with the truth, in this case the truth about the sacramental nature of the postures at Mass and their meaning. Answered by Colin B. Donovan, STL[/quote] Edited April 30, 2007 by Maria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maria Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 (edited) At my parish the children are invited up for the Our Father, and they hold hands. At camp and with my young adult's group, both of which have a close community feel, we hold hands during Mass. I suspect, though, that we would also respect the decision not to hold hands. Edited April 30, 2007 by Maria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest T-Bone Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 [quote name='Knight of the Holy Rosary' post='1260005' date='Apr 29 2007, 07:08 PM']Yeah...it's one thing to do it, but to pressure others too is just rude. I once attended a Mass at a parish where they took there hand-holding seriously. Immediately, I closed my eyes and folded my hands and somebody actually slapped my arm and said, with a reprimanding tone, 'we hold hands at this parish'. I just kept my eyes closed and pretended I didn't feel or hear anything. That's not cool...[/quote] I'd be tempted to reply: At MY parish, we follow the GIRM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddington Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Growing up, I always thought that it was necessary to hold hands. I wish I woulda known. Instead of probably creeping out some people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercy me Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 [quote name='T-Bone' post='1260291' date='Apr 30 2007, 12:10 AM']I'd be tempted to reply: At MY parish, we follow the GIRM.[/quote] The GIRM defines the proper possition for the priest but not the rest of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now