NewReformation Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='1213023' date='Mar 13 2007, 12:03 PM']The Church is the one who guarentees the books are the inspired Word of God, since she is the one who made the final choices. btw what Bible do you use?[/quote] I use several. The Geneva 1599, King Jimmy, New King Jimmy, NASB, Bishops, Modern King Jimmy, Webster's, Complete Jewish Bible, and others. Primarily, the NKJV or Geneva 1599. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 [quote name='NewReformation' post='1213033' date='Mar 13 2007, 01:21 PM']I use several. The Geneva 1599, King Jimmy, New King Jimmy, NASB, Bishops, Modern King Jimmy, Webster's, Complete Jewish Bible, and others. Primarily, the NKJV or Geneva 1599.[/quote] Have youever tried an RSV? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewReformation Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='1213063' date='Mar 13 2007, 01:03 PM']Have youever tried an RSV?[/quote] I've read a bit of it, but I don't have a copy of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Gone Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 Sir, I didnt talk down to you. Just cause someone disagrees with you does not mean they are talking down to you. Baptists are protestant. I stand with what I said in regards to your signature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 [quote name='Revprodeji' post='1213084' date='Mar 13 2007, 03:24 PM']Sir, I didnt talk down to you. Just cause someone disagrees with you does not mean they are talking down to you. Baptists are protestant. I stand with what I said in regards to your signature[/quote] Revj we consider them protestants but they do not. The Baptists were made by John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1607. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Gone Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 My background and experience is in the baptist community; under the mentorship of one of their better theologians. That is the arena I was born in. Thats why the comment "im not protestant" reminds me of a lil kid sitting in a corner covering his eyes saying "you cant see me, you cant see me" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewReformation Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 (edited) [quote name='cmotherofpirl' post='1213131' date='Mar 13 2007, 03:57 PM']Revj we consider them protestants but they do not. The Baptists were made by John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1607.[/quote] Many Baptists would consider that the first time the word "Baptists" was used as a denominational identifier. Edited March 13, 2007 by NewReformation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewReformation Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 [quote name='Revprodeji' post='1213134' date='Mar 13 2007, 04:06 PM']My background and experience is in the baptist community; under the mentorship of one of their better theologians. That is the arena I was born in. Thats why the comment "im not protestant" reminds me of a lil kid sitting in a corner covering his eyes saying "you cant see me, you cant see me"[/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RezaMikhaeil Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 [quote name='NewReformation' post='1212978' date='Mar 13 2007, 09:17 AM']Merely because a book of Scripture quotes an extra-biblical book, it does not mean that the extra-biblical book involved is inspired.[/quote] This is true because the book of "Jude" also quotes alot of books that no Christians at all use and some rare ones such as the book of Enoch that only Etheopian Orthodox use. Reza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Gone Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 [quote name='NewReformation' post='1213142' date='Mar 13 2007, 04:24 PM'][/quote] Can you please give me more than that? Revisionist history does not stand up well, and that is all you are promoting in your eccesiological defination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewReformation Posted March 13, 2007 Share Posted March 13, 2007 (edited) [quote name='Revprodeji' post='1213156' date='Mar 13 2007, 05:18 PM']Can you please give me more than that? Revisionist history does not stand up well, and that is all you are promoting in your eccesiological defination[/quote]Never Mind. Edited March 13, 2007 by NewReformation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted March 14, 2007 Share Posted March 14, 2007 [quote name='NewReformation' post='1213141' date='Mar 13 2007, 05:23 PM']Many Baptists would consider that the first time the word "Baptists" was used as a denominational identifier.[/quote] When do the Baptists believe they were made? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Gone Posted March 14, 2007 Share Posted March 14, 2007 ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffpugh Posted March 14, 2007 Author Share Posted March 14, 2007 [quote name='RezaLemmyng' post='1213151' date='Mar 13 2007, 05:04 PM']This is true because the book of "Jude" also quotes alot of books that no Christians at all use and some rare ones such as the book of Enoch that only Etheopian Orthodox use. Reza[/quote] Ooh... book of Enoch? Why have I heard of that before? What does everyone think of that? Any web links so that I can see an English translation of this (out of interest of course)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightofChrist Posted March 14, 2007 Share Posted March 14, 2007 (edited) [quote name='NewReformation' post='1212978' date='Mar 13 2007, 10:17 AM']Merely because a book of Scripture quotes an extra-biblical book, it does not mean that the extra-biblical book involved is inspired.[/quote] Well to begin with the Deutero-Canonical Books are not "extra-biblical" they are biblical and inspired. But true just because Christ quotes the Deutero-Canonical Books does not mean they belong per say, but it does help the side that they do belong. And does not help the side that they do not. The fact remains the Deutero-Canonical Books where in of the canon of Christ and His Apostles, and Christians kept them until the likes of Martin Luther. Who used the a council of the Jews to throw them out. This council had no power, the authority of the Chair of Moses had already been given the the Chair of Peter. Edited March 14, 2007 by KnightofChrist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now