catholicinsd Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 While that is wrong, and unholy Mrs. Clinton is not breaking a law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 It is breaking the moral law to support abortion, and no one is excused from the moral culpability associated with such a crime simply because the positive law of the State endorses the act in question. Abortion is a moral evil, and so to endorse it as a good is most reprehensible. A Catholic is not free to minimise the criminal nature of abortion, and to even try to do so is at a minimum [i]scandalous[/i], and -- depending upon the person's knowledge and the extent of his deliberation in a given case -- it could be an act of [i]heresy[/i]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catholicinsd Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I agree she is breaking the Law of God, Mrs. Clinton isn't any Civil Laws Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mateo el Feo Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Speaking about the Federal Marriage Amendment, Sen. Clinton states:[quote name='Hillary Clinton']It was the first time anyone was proposing we amend the Constitution to deny citizens rights rather than widen the circle of rights and opportunities[/quote]Ummm...maybe she should look at the 18th amendment. In fact, she mentions not only amendments, but also proposed amendments, many of which would have "denied citizens rights". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catholicinsd Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 [quote name='Mateo el Feo' post='1209802' date='Mar 7 2007, 12:19 PM']Speaking about the Federal Marriage Amendment, Sen. Clinton states:Ummm...maybe she should look at the 18th amendment.[/quote] That was overturned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 [quote name='catholicinsd' post='1209801' date='Mar 7 2007, 10:18 AM']I agree she is breaking the Law of God, Mrs. Clinton isn't any Civil Laws[/quote] The positive law of the State must reflect the eternal Law of God. Thus, any positive enactment of the State that is contrary to the immutable moral law is an abuse, and no one is permitted to accept or follow such an enactment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mateo el Feo Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 [quote name='catholicinsd' post='1209805' date='Mar 7 2007, 01:24 PM']That was overturned[/quote]Really? LOL. And your point is? If you'd like a few proposed amendments which deny citizens rights, try: [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_Desecration_Amendment"]Flag Desecration Amendment[/url] [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titles_of_Nobility_amendment"]Titles of Nobility amendment[/url] [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labor_amendment"]Child Labor Amendment[/url] [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Life_Amendment"]Human Life Amendment[/url] (some versions) As I said above, Sen. Clinton does not know the US Constitution, based on her claim that amendments and proposed amendments would not deny citizens' rights. I've cited both actual and proposed amendments which show her to be incorrect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God the Father Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 [quote name='catholicinsd' post='1209779' date='Mar 7 2007, 12:41 PM']Usig the F-bomb is hateful, no matter what[/quote] You're misusing the idiom "F-bomb." It's "[F-Bomb] you Dorothy, and your little dog too." not "Throw another [F-Bomb] on the fire." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ardillacid Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 (edited) [quote name='God the Father' post='1209886' date='Mar 7 2007, 02:41 PM']You're misusing the idiom "F-bomb." It's "[F-Bomb] you Dorothy, and your little dog too." not "Throw another [F-Bomb] on the fire."[/quote] Thanks for that clarification, God. I really was wondering why one had to be hateful if you say floopy. Now, it makes sense if she called someone a flower Edited March 7, 2007 by notardillacid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catholicinsd Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Perhaps we should use the term "f-bag" as oppose to 'f-bomb' when we reference what Ms. Coulter said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 yeah. i was a little confused at first but I eventually understood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catholictothecore Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This is scary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God the Father Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 [quote name='catholicinsd' post='1209896' date='Mar 7 2007, 04:02 PM']Perhaps we should use the term "f-bag" as oppose to 'f-bomb' when we reference what Ms. Coulter said.[/quote] Perhaps it's only offensive to hyper-sensitive bleeding hearts who make up no more than five percent of the population and, although should be used sparingly, shouldn't be censored at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socrates Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 [quote name='catholicinsd' post='1209028' date='Mar 6 2007, 09:37 AM']Do you people have nothing better to do with your time than to drink the Cool-Ai of the fundalmetalist hate-everything Right Wing?[/quote] Do you have nothing better to do with your time than to drink the Cool-Aid of the Communist hate-everything-Christian Left Wing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socrates Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 [quote name='catholicinsd' post='1209756' date='Mar 7 2007, 12:06 PM']I agree. Mrs. Bush killed a person. Mrs. Clinton's husband isn't the best man ever. No comparsion at all.[/quote] Hillary was very much an active participant in her husband's crimes. Mrs. Bush is not running for public office, so a tragic accident she had 44 years ago as a teenager has no bearing on anything. Nor does Anne Coulter using a naughty word. (And as far as I'm aware, Miss Coulter isn't running for public office either. And I thought you liberals were all about "free speech"!) Those are the most pathetic excuses I have ever seen for supporting a politician who actively supports abortion and immorality. Clinton & co. must have fed you some strong Kool-Aid indeed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now