Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Moral Or Not


vianney

Recommended Posts

TempleofVesarius

I'm not completely blind to the point that Jas is making...I disagree with parts of it.

As far as the immorality of breaking the law...

Morality is based on how the action effects you and others around you. If what we do is done responsibly so that it can hurt no one, then how can it be immoral?

So by what you are saying, it is just as immoral to jaywalk or to speed or to burn a copy of a cd?

Or is it just immoral because it is drinking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TempleofVesarius

so why not just increase penalties for drunk driving??

And if I drink and dont drive...why does that law have to apply to me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hyperdulia again

it's not that i don't get jas's point, i don't think it's a valid one. i think there is a complete disconnect between law and morality. breaking the law is not in and of itself truly wrong, it depends on the law and on the harm that comes from breaking it. no one is hurt by the fact that i drink. the catholic chgurch doesn't say that i shouldn't drink, therefore i gladly drinnk with a clear conscience.

Edited by hyperdulia again
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morallity is not only based on the consequences.

Is it a lie if it doesn't harm the other person? Is it okay to steal a dollar if the other person does not miss the dollar. It's only a dollar.

Hyper,

The Catholic Church teaches we are to obey the law unless there is a higher moral purpose to disobey it. Regardless of how good or bad we feel about the law.

My ultimate goal is to discourage underage drinking. Not only is it morally wrong, but it is a misconception of the lack of harm caused by it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not completely blind to the point that Jas is making...I disagree with parts of it.

As far as the immorality of breaking the law...

Morality is based on how the action effects you and others around you. If what we do is done responsibly so that it can hurt no one, then how can it be immoral?

So by what you are saying, it is just as immoral to jaywalk or to speed or to burn a copy of a cd?

Or is it just immoral because it is drinking?

You are right about morality. It is possible however that you are hurting yourself by breaking the law. For one, you are breaking down your own sense of authority and of obedience. As Catholics we should know about those two ideas. It is also a matter of respect to obey the law. I hate many of the laws in this country (see Texas sodomy ruling as example) yet I still love this country.

We have seen that there are exceptions to underage drinking (religious services, with the responsible supervision of parents)..we should keep in mind that this entire discussion is supposed to focus on underage college drinking. No parents, usually at a strangers house, with tons of other kids around. Just as there are exceptions to underage drinking, there are exceptions to other laws. Speeding is acceptable if you're going w/ the flow of traffic. Otherwise, you should not speed. You should not jaywalk either. It is an instance of breaking the law, disrespecting authority, and being disobedient. Give to Ceasar what it Ceasar's. Yes, burning illegal copies is immorral. Besides being illegal, it is stealing.

Pax Christi-

logos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hyperdulia again

Thank you ToV.

Actually in my state I'm not breaking any law as long as someone over twenty one is in the room/house, so an otherwise inocuous act becomes immoral when one crosses state lines? THat is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TempleofVesarius

what if im going with the flow of life and having a beer with a few of my friends I havent seen in a while?????

why is speeding acceptable as long as everyone is doing it???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes...but a lying and stealing HURT THE PERSON DOING THE LYING AND STEALING

You are correct. Now let me ask you a question, if you take a dollar from me, and I don't notice it and not miss it, how are you hurt and how am I hurt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TempleofVesarius

Im hurt because it breaks down my honesty whether you know it or not....

and i know where you are going with it

Logos said it a sec ago

Breaking the law breaks down my sense of authority...but if the law is wacted, my sense of authority on the matter is already broken down.

Edited by TempleofVesarius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you ToV.

Actually in my state I'm not breaking any law as long as someone over twenty one is in the room/house, so an otherwise inocuous act becomes immoral when one crosses state lines? THat is silly.

There are two acts.

One act is drinking within the law.

The other act is breaking the law. It has already pointed out that it doesn't matter if the law is silly or not. It is not morally permissible to intentionally break the law.

ToV.

Speeding was brought up as going with the flow of traffic. You could know that mean on a highway, not speeding through a neighborhood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TempleofVesarius

highway or neighborhood...going anywhere above the posted speed limit is against the law

(i didnt say it was immoral)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're just re-hashing the same old argument with different words.

Going 5 mph over in a 70 mph zone is different than going 5 mph in a 15 mph school crossing zone. Nobody thought you weren't reasonable.

It's 8 pm here. I've been posting while waiting for reports to print at work. It's been a 13 hour day for me with not break. I'm done wit'ya...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TempleofVesarius

Im not re-hashing anything

Is BREAKING THE LAW to speed immoral in one case?

yes

in the other?

prolly not

so is breaking the law for me to drink responsibly immoral?

is breaking the law for someone to drink irresponsibly immoral?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IcePrincessKRS

I can't believe this thread is 7 pages.. .where have I been?

I agree with Winchester.

Something does not become moral or immoral based upon legislation. It's perfectly okay to drink underage, because the laws are arbitrary.

In moderation, it's okay, just like for those in the (current) legal drinking age.

And with dUSt on this statement as well:

So... If you were to drink under age, it wouldn't neccesarily be immoral--rather, unlawful

The immorality of breaking most laws is that they go against Natural Law. Having a beer under the age of 21 breaks a civil law, but in and of itself may not be immoral. Having an alcoholic beverage does nto go against Natural Law. I think speeding (since this seems to be the hot-topic comparison) is worse than an 18 year old drinking responsibly (key word here "responsibly"). Alot more harm can come to those around you when you're speeding than when you drink a couple beers responsibly (again, not that key word...).

No one should get drunk, thats a sin no matter how old you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...