Pro-life Racist

[iKonstantin]

What?

Isn't it common knowledge Vatican 1 and 2 were backlash against Thomism, Saints are not infallibile.





-bpat Konstantin

[desertwoman]

I voted not to vote for the racist. Seeing segragation again is something worse than death. Man, what if he then wanted slavery to come again.

Just like all of the other enslaved Africans who killed their children because they knew of the tortures that will come to them will happen all over again.

[Hascal]

this is simple for me... segregation smells of elderberries and abortion should be legal. im voting for the other guy

[Winchester]

I finally voted, and I voted "no" because I would never vote [i]for[/i] a racist. I would, however, vote [i]against[/i] a worse evil.

If it got bad enough, those who had been permitted life could always rise up.

[Jesus_lol]

[quote name='catholicinsd' post='1131625' date='Nov 30 2006, 12:11 AM']
Notard, let's say, that it isn't senate, (where 1 vote doesn't change anything too much, as you correctly said,) Let's say its another office with the power to re-instate Apartied.
[/quote]

well if the choices were that bad and he stood for plunging the world in to the dark ages again, im sure he would be assasinated in a short order.

[got2luvjc]

[quote name='Jesus_lol' post='1138586' date='Dec 9 2006, 04:08 AM']
well if the choices were that bad and he stood for plunging the world in to the dark ages again, im sure he would be assasinated in a short order.
[/quote]

hehe. I don't think the American population would vote for someone who is pro-segregation. I wouldn't. And, there is no 1 position in the American Gov't that has ALL the power. Even the president can be overrulled.

[CoffeeCatholic]

prolilfe is not just anti-abortion. Prolife includes being against racism. therefore, this candidate is not prolife

[avemaria40]

[quote name='CoffeeCatholic' post='1139361' date='Dec 10 2006, 07:30 PM']
prolilfe is not just anti-abortion. Prolife includes being against racism. therefore, this candidate is not prolife
[/quote]

I agree with you. As I've said before, I wouldn't vote for either. I'd protest both campaigns.

[avemaria40]

[quote name='Socrates' post='1132546' date='Nov 30 2006, 11:48 PM']
Of course the same thing could be said of murders of already-born people.
That doesn't mean we should legalize murder, or other such crimes.
[/quote]

That's true. There are women who throw their newborn babies in trash cans, sewers and toilets for a variety of reasons. That's definitely not legal, so why should murdering them before they are born be legal?

That said, I'm a woman, I know people who've had babies out of wedlock, and a number of my friends were conceived/born out of wedlock. If their mothers didn't choose to give them life, my best friends wouldn't be here I would gladly help someone who found themselves in this situation and I plan on joining Feminists for Life when I go to college this fall. Trust me, I have plenty of empathy for these women, would I want to help them if I didn't? I don't see why we can't help both the mother and her little child.

Besides, it doesn't matter if someone can't feel pain when being killed. Some people are born without Substance P, the neurotransmitter that makes you feel pain, does that make them not human? Or how about if someone gives you anesthesia before they kill you, aren't you still being killed.

[SJRod55]

[quote]What the heck is an African-American, pray tell? No such thing. If they are an American citizen, which I must assume, since they are running for office, then they are an American. Period. Regardless of race. This hyphenated carp needs to stop - all it does is serve to divide us.[/quote]

Agreed

[heavenseeker]

highly un-likely

[Dismas]

[quote name='catholicinsd' post='1131614' date='Nov 30 2006, 01:54 AM']Please explain below.

PS The other canidate is a African American, who is pro-choice.[/quote]

I would, even if I was black. The magnitude of the violence of one simply outweighs the violence of the other. At least the segregation can be opposed by the ones suffering it, the unborn do not have such recourse.

[ironmonk]

[quote name='catholicinsd' post='1131614' date='Nov 30 2006, 02:54 AM']Please explain below.

PS The other canidate is a African American, who is pro-choice.[/quote]

What does African American have to do with anything... they does not tell us that he's black or white. I know a ton of white Africans.

The fact is, anyone who would vote for the prochoice person when a prolife person is running, then they would be sinning.

I would have to say that a person who would think that segragation is a greater issue than the killing of the unborn is a very ignorant Catholic and shouldn't be voting at all... until they get a clue and spend a few years studying Scripture and the Catechism.

[ironmonk]

[quote name='CoffeeCatholic' post='1139361' date='Dec 10 2006, 08:30 PM']prolilfe is not just anti-abortion. Prolife includes being against racism. therefore, this candidate is not prolife[/quote]
wrong.

[catholicinsd]

[quote name='ironmonk' post='1406908' date='Oct 21 2007, 10:30 PM']wrong.[/quote]

Are you saying racism is OK?