megamattman1 Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 You may not like the terms, but it does seem you agree to one universal invisible church that consists of only faithful Christians (subject to pontificate in your case). Are we on the same page that this does exist? Or do we have a misunderstanding somewhere still? I agree. But don't try to underscore the Catholics belief in calling on Jesus as Lord and Savior. And if you acknowledge this much as well that begs the question of why you don't believe in the Catholic Church. i think what your underlying theme is (even if you don't realize it? or realize it but not in ways enough to state it explicitly!) is what i said in my last post. you don't understand the necessity of the catholic church. is that a fair assumption? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Circle_Master Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 I suppose that is mostly fair. I don't understand the necessity of the catholic church. A single visible church would be useful if I saw Scripture pointing to one, but I don't, and history doesn't seem to either of the first century church. Usefulness never produces necessity in my mind however. Hopefully that is clear enough for my position, my mind is swimming a little atm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman82 Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 So, are non-Catholic Christians really members of the Body of Christ, members of the Church, members of the body of believers, if their "body of beliefs' are not in accord with the beliefs of the Catholic Church? If the answer is yes, then why do the Scriptures say: "One Faith, One baptism, One Lord"? As one very wise poster puts it, "Christ has a bride, not a harem." Pax Christi. <>< CCC 838 says thast they are in an "imperfect" union with the Catholic Church. And I have to remember the "bride vs. harem" analogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasJis Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 Of course non-Catholics and non-Christians can be members of the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is many things. On Earth, it is the outward sign of people attempting to embrace the fullness of Grace God's revealation with knowledge the fullness of Grace comes through God's Church. All People who attempt to embrace the fullness of Good they see inscribed in their heart and in the world, are members of the same Catholic Church in a spiritual sense. The Unity effected is by the Grace of Jesus Christ and His will that we all be one. Grace is often blocked and ignored by our Sins. Grace moves us, but never overcomes our Free Will. God will judge our actions, read our hearts, and will know perfectly well what Graces He offered us, we recognized, and we refused. God will also know what sins of the world, of others, have effected our ability to comprehend and recognize Good, and limit our response to it. (see Invincible Ignorance, and the culpability of people raised outside the Catholic Faith). Catholic Church = Earthly and Heavenly Institution but One Church incorporated in the Body of Christ Membership in the Catholic Church = Normative Temporal membership = Being a "card carrying, faithful Catholic" here on Earth. Spiritual members = Being joined to the Body of Christ through our response to the Grace God has gifted each and every soul to recognize and follow Good (God) to the fullness of Grace granted. Not everyone has recieved the Grace of devout and faithful Catholic parents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mario Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 i wonder if this is really important. while i am catholic, i tend to think of God and Jesus and Mother Mary in more personal terms. God loves me more than i can imagine. he loves me now when i have returned to the Church, he loved me before when i turned away from the church, and i beleive that he loved me before time itself. i personally know a lot of non-catholics who are good decent people. i cannot for one moment imagine that God does not love them as well. mario Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Circle_Master Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 Membership in the Catholic Church = Normative Temporal membership = Being a "card carrying, faithful Catholic" here on Earth. Spiritual members = Being joined to the Body of Christ through our response to the Grace God has gifted each and every soul to recognize and follow Good (God) to the fullness of Grace granted. Not everyone has recieved the Grace of devout and faithful Catholic parents. So you agree in an invisible church, correct? I just want someone to clarify this and actually say it so we can discuss new things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geetarplayer Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 Here's the devil's advocate in me: Ghandi was not a very religious man--he willingly rejected Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism. But he was very spiritual. He always acted out of love. According to Catholic teachings, is he eligible for Salvation? -Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don John of Austria Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 Ghandi I was wondering when someone would bring him up. We do not know what was in someones heart, but Gandi willingly and publicly rejected Christ, unlike many in his country,he had a complete education and a great deal of oppertunity to learn about Christ. While agian we cannot know a man's fate, he certianly does not fall into the area of invincable ignorance, or even vincable ignorance, he wasn't ignorant he simply rejected Christ so know he would not be eligable for salvation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mario Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 i don't mean to be pedantic, but it's spelt "Gandhi" personally i'm not Gandhi's biggest fan. those who are more closer to Indian history would probably tell you that he did more harm than good. anyway politics aside, you raise a very important point. To reject God and his Church is to reject salvation. the parameters of what is the Church and just what constitutes rejection need to be explored however. what is the church? i've read through all 4 pages of this thread and i'm even more confused then before. and just what would constitute rejection? would questioning constitute rejection? is it not possible that the chuch can make mistakes? certainly people do commit errors no matter how noble their intentions may be. i beleive it is very important that we never stop praying. we must look beyond the mistakes of the past, and accept the Church. if only i could share a little of the shame, that i feel for rejecting the church as well as the incredible feeling and comfort in knowing that while i strayed, God never stopped loving me. i read the above paragraphs that i write and i know i'm not making much sense. i suppose i am not that good at putting how i feel into words. but i hope and pray that you find the same happiness and comfort that i feel. whenever in doubt pray. mario Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don John of Austria Posted January 18, 2004 Share Posted January 18, 2004 I just quoted the above spelling because I couldn't remember how to spell it. And no the Church doesn't make mistakes, members of the CHurch do but the Church does not. That being said you must pay for your mistakes, if its a big one like rejecting Christ well its a big penalty, Hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted January 19, 2004 Share Posted January 19, 2004 (edited) The Church IS invisible in a sense--to say otherwise would be to make oneself a Feeneyite, and is made up of those who, to borrow Jas's beautiful phrasing, love (or I would go even further, try not to hate) Good. The Church is also a visible institution of people who wear the appelation "Catholic" and recognize the Earthly Headship of Christ's Vicar. This is a paradox. Catholicism is covered with paradoxes, with things that must nuanced just right or else one makes a heretical statement, this is why Holy Church only defines Her doctrines under duress. Edited January 19, 2004 by hyperdulia again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don John of Austria Posted January 19, 2004 Share Posted January 19, 2004 Loveing Good is not enough, one must be truely invincbly ignorant to be saved if one is not part of the Visable Church, there is not ssome general" it doesn't matter what church you belong to" garbage. It matters the only sure path that we know to salvation is the Sacramental path within the Visable Catholic Church, the rest is just speculation based on Gods amesome mercy, and has been defined as applying ONLY to those who CANNOT have chosen for Christ and His Church not those that DO NOT chose for Christ and His Bride no matter how much they love Good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now