cmotherofpirl Posted January 15, 2004 Share Posted January 15, 2004 It was supposed to say full, not dull. I have very bad eyesight and have great difficulty proofreading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabukthumpa Posted January 15, 2004 Author Share Posted January 15, 2004 Sorry CMother - I was not responding with a negative tone. Thanks for the hard work on getting info to people. Peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dabukthumpa Posted January 22, 2004 Author Share Posted January 22, 2004 any takers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 (edited) BUMP as dairygirl4u2c has brought up this subject again with an artical which states: [quote]Pope Honorious was condemned as a heretic by the Sixth Ecumenical Council (680-681 A.D.). (This means that Honorious made doctrinal statements which are contrary to the Roman Catholic faith.) He was also condemned as a heretic by Pope Leo II, as well as by every other pope until the eleventh century. So here we have "infallible" popes condemning another "infallible" pope as a heretic. [/quote] dairygirl, i encourage you to read the artical that PhatCatholic provided, it is quite informative as to the nature of this event. duh, oops, i went on a search for a thread where this was discussed b4... and i never bothered to check where this was, just assumed it was in open mic. do you think we could move this to the debate table please? pretty please with a cherry on top? Edited August 9, 2004 by Aloysius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franciscanheart Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 im gunna study and get back to you on that one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorphRC Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 I dont know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted August 9, 2004 Share Posted August 9, 2004 read PhatCatholic's artical, that was the whole reason i bumped this! ahh... nevermind on moving this to the debate table, i'm just gonna use his artical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now