Guest T-Bone Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 [code]1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the commandment of God our Saviour, and of Christ Jesus our hope: 2 To Timothy, his beloved son in faith. Grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father, and from Christ Jesus our Lord. 3 As I desired thee to remain at Ephesus when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some not to teach otherwise, 4 Not to give heed to fables and endless genealogies: which furnish questions rather than the edification of God, which is in faith. [/code] The fable about the geneology of Jesus' decendents? The whole comspiracy theory asks more questions than it gives, it does not glorify God, and it damages the faith of some. Or am I way off base here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eutychus Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 [quote]4 Not to give heed to fables and endless genealogies: which furnish questions rather than the edification of God, which is in faith. [/quote] You mean like the apostolic succession charts and ordination trees going back hundreds of years, is that what you mean by endless geneologies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesuspaidtheprice Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Are you going to offer some kind of reason behind the correlation you are attempting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 [quote name='Eutychus' post='1096386' date='Oct 19 2006, 10:45 PM'] You mean like the apostolic succession charts and ordination trees going back hundreds of years, is that what you mean by endless geneologies? [/quote] Its wonderful to have a direct link to the Apostles and Jesus Christ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akalyte Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 [quote name='Eutychus' post='1096386' date='Oct 19 2006, 09:45 PM'] You mean like the apostolic succession charts and ordination trees going back hundreds of years, is that what you mean by endless geneologies? [/quote] Apostolic succession and endless geneologies are two different things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eutychus Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 [quote]Apostolic succession and endless geneologies are two different things. [/quote] Yeah, ONE you do....that is "good" the other you don't, that is "bad." Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest T-Bone Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 [quote name='Eutychus' post='1096386' date='Oct 19 2006, 07:45 PM'] You mean like the apostolic succession charts and ordination trees going back hundreds of years, is that what you mean by endless geneologies? [/quote] So you support the Da Vinci Code theory? You beleive that Christ has decendants. And that there is a secret organization devoted to keeping this secret known amongst a select few. (I'm only assuming this because you use this thread as a forum to diss the Church.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cathoholic_anonymous Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 Eutychus seems confused about what a genealogy is. According to the Oxford English dictionary, it is [i]an account of one's descent from an ancestor or ancestors, by enumeration of the intermediate persons; a pedigree. b. The line of development of an animal or plant from older forms. 2. Lineage, pedigree, family stock. 3. Progeny, offspring. [/i] As you can see, a genealogy refers to a bloodline. Apostolic succession is nothing to do with a person's blood or 'pedigree'; it isn't a family business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 [quote name='Jesuspaidtheprice' post='1096718' date='Oct 20 2006, 10:37 AM'] Are you going to offer some kind of reason behind the correlation you are attempting? [/quote] [quote name='Eutychus' post='1096750' date='Oct 20 2006, 11:28 AM'] Yeah, ONE you do....that is "good" the other you don't, that is "bad." Got it. [/quote] Reason? That would be negative, ghost rider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now