Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Budge, Cite Your Source

Winchester

By Winchester
in Catholic Debate Table

 Share

Recommended Posts

Winchester

Winchester

Posted
Posted

[quote name='Budge' post='1065262' date='Sep 17 2006, 04:53 PM']
From Catholic Apologist Technique List.
Cant you folks come up with better then this?
* 3: Accusation of hate technique


Insist vehemently that your opponent is full of hate.
It is always advisable to paint your opponent as hateful.
This technique should always contain a reference,
to your extreme caringness and the limitless bounds of your great humility.


[/quote]


Where's that from?

Which book, who gave the Imprimatur and the Nihil Obstat.

I am not saying it does not exist, nor that the two things above are infallible actions, I merely want you to cite your accusation, not that it's an official teaching.

Really, Budge, who are you trying to convince with this stuff? How does it bear on Catholicism if someone wrote this? It's not dogmatic. Explain, for the love of sanity if nothing else. I mean, I make fun of you alot, and this is just so incredibly sad that I'm having a hard time. It's getting to be like kicking an old blind dog. You're really falling apart at the seams here.

That aside, cite your source. I'd love to read this book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
phatcatholic

phatcatholic

Posted
Posted

one of the members of his ezboard wrote that. u won't find it in a book or anything. i've seen it before, from the Former Catholics For Christ ezboard, and most of their members belong to his board too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kamiller42

kamiller42

Posted
Posted (edited)

Double bump. I've done a Google search for this supposed list. I can't find anything except references to Budge. I think it's fudged.

Next, we will see references to "credible" sites claiming the Pope to be a Reptilian. :rolleyes:

Edited by kamiller42
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Didymus

Didymus

Posted
Posted

[quote name='phatcatholic' post='1065653' date='Sep 17 2006, 11:43 PM']
one of the members of his ezboard wrote that. u won't find it in a book or anything. i've seen it before, from the Former Catholics For Christ ezboard, and most of their members belong to his board too.
[/quote]

ahhhh...

Former Catholics for Christ

good times, good times

Link to comment
Share on other sites
goldenchild17

goldenchild17

Posted
Posted (edited)

[quote name='kamiller42' post='1066290' date='Sep 18 2006, 08:11 PM']
Double bump. I've done a Google search for this supposed list. I can't find anything except references to Budge. I think it's fudged.

Next, we will see references to "credible" sites claiming the Pope to be a Reptilian. :rolleyes:
[/quote]

It's from a catholic apologist's blog, who I believe was quoting a protestant (who came up with such a list) in debate: [url="http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005/10/anti-catholics-david-gibson-1st.html"]http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005/10/ant...gibson-1st.html[/url]

At least that's the only place I could find it.

Edited by goldenchild17
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kamiller42

kamiller42

Posted
Posted

[quote name='goldenchild17' post='1066299' date='Sep 18 2006, 08:37 PM']
It's from a catholic apologist's blog, who I believe was quoting a protestant (who came up with such a list) in debate: [url="http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005/10/anti-catholics-david-gibson-1st.html"]http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005/10/ant...gibson-1st.html[/url]

At least that's the only place I could find it.
[/quote]
:notworthy2: I bow to a superior internet researcher. :) Thanks for the find!

So Budge portraying an Apologist Technique list as being written by a Catholic when it was actually written by a Protestant would be... oh what's the word? Deceptive! From Budge? Not surprising. :ohno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KnightofChrist

KnightofChrist

Posted
Posted

[quote name='kamiller42' post='1066433' date='Sep 18 2006, 10:16 PM']
:notworthy2: I bow to a superior internet researcher. :) Thanks for the find!

So Budge portraying an Apologist Technique list as being written by a Catholic when it was actually written by a Protestant would be... oh what's the word? Deceptive! From Budge? Not surprising. :ohno:
[/quote]


:smokey: You know, I really dont think thats the cause, really. It is more likey she just doesnt read all of what she quotes from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Buzzard

Buzzard

Posted
Posted

[quote name='goldenchild17' post='1066299' date='Sep 18 2006, 07:37 PM']
It's from a catholic apologist's blog, who I believe was quoting a protestant (who came up with such a list) in debate: [url="http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005/10/anti-catholics-david-gibson-1st.html"]http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2005/10/ant...gibson-1st.html[/url]

At least that's the only place I could find it.
[/quote]
try here

[b][u]Techniques[/u][/b]
[url="http://p094.ezboard.com/fcatholicreformationfrm19.showMessage?topicID=42.topic"]http://p094.ezboard.com/fcatholicreformati...opicID=42.topic[/url]

I'm the guilty party

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatholicCid

CatholicCid

Posted
Posted (edited)

So your the "they" in "they posted it"

Though, I agree with the blogger... Saying Catholic's use Ad Hominen then using thme in the actual arguments :idontknow:

Edited by CatholicCid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...