goldbug16 Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 That was a bit harsh Keyser Soze. I really have to agree with you though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyser Soze Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 People that make idiotic comments like that, deserve harsh. It's the only way to get through to someone like that. What he said was ignorant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldbug16 Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 I know, it was. I pity him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick777 Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 Okay that reminded me of, "I pity the fool." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missionseeker Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 This thread reminds me of the upcoming AL governors race Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Just Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 thats real mature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 I bet [b]President[/b] Bush knows how to spell [b]presidency[/b] better than the fellow calling him a "child". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverheadNite Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 I don't lile president Bush. I also didn't like President Clinton. We should give this government back to God the Father Almighty like it should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jiyoung Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 I don't think Bush is perfect, but he's a heck of a lot better than the alternatives. And while "lesser evil" isn't a good policy, it's all we've got here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catholicinsd Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 [quote name='Aloysius' post='961188' date='Apr 25 2006, 10:13 PM'] I bet [b]President[/b] Bush knows how to spell [b]presidency[/b] better than the fellow calling him a "child". [/quote] Sorta like Quayles' potatoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ardillacid Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 [quote name='OverheadNite' post='961195' date='Apr 25 2006, 10:19 PM'] I don't lile president Bush. I also didn't like President Clinton. We should give this government back to [b]God the Father[/b] Almighty like it should be. [/quote] [img]http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/uploads/av-3598.jpg[/img] are you so sure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missionseeker Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aloysius Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 just like a modernist english speaker... Dan was using an archaic spelling of the word, which was probably taught to him in school or by his parents. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "potatoe" as a variant spelling of the word. But you can blame him for his educational background just as irrationally as you can blame Bush for his accent, I suppose. "presdency", however, is not an acceptable spelling in any century or educational background. I make a point of it to always spell "potatoe" with the e, because otherwise that o at the end should be pronounced softly by the rules of english pronunciation. The e should be placed there, and I will always place it there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelFilo Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 He's not a mainstream Republican, just like his father. Reagen's statement "the government that governs best, governs least" is the ideal of the old stock Republician who has some libertine sensibilities, who wants no massive welfare state, nor a country whose main costs is a gigantic military budget. Bush senior and junior are both not of that type of Republican. Reagen preached it, but didn't put it into action (he made the deficiet sore as high as the sky). The very evident domestic policy of Bush, "no child left behind", the Patriot act, etc are all federal government hands on type of governing. Democrats do that, Republicans ought to lead the country, not increase the federal government's already broad role in society. God bless, Mikey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ardillacid Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 what about Justices Roberts and Alito? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now