Receive the Eucharist in Mortal Sin will damage your Faith

[ironmonk]

[quote](Corpus Christi 2002 (A): This homily was given on June 2, 2002 at St. Pius X Church, Westerly, R.I. by Fr. Raymond Suriani. Read 1 Corinthians 11: 17-34; John 6: 51-58.)
"’Voltaire’s Prescription’ and the Holy Eucharist."

I call it "Voltaire’s Prescription."

Back in the 18th century, a young man wrote to Voltaire, the famous French philosopher of the Enlightenment, to tell him about a problem he was experiencing. He said that he desperately wanted to become an atheist, curse God, despise the Church, and renounce his Catholic faith—as Voltaire was exhorting people to do—but what stood in the way was a powerful attraction he felt to the Holy Eucharist.

How could he possibly rid himself of this unenlightened, superstitious belief in the presence of Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament? That was the question he posed to Voltaire.

The philosopher wrote back and gave him the following advice:

Rather than telling him to stay away from church and the sacraments, Voltaire told the young man to go to church and to receive Communion as often as possible—five or six times a day. He said, "And as you do, say to yourself, ‘I do not believe; I hate God; this is pure superstition.’"

Then he told his young disciple to commit as many mortal sins as possible, while continuing to go to Communion. This combination, he maintained, would eventually destroy his faith completely.

And he was right. Four months later, the proud young man wrote back to say that he was now a committed, convinced atheist.

This was "Voltaire’s Prescription" for the total destruction of belief: step 1 was for a person to receive the Eucharist "in bad faith" (so to speak), without any intention of deepening his relationship with the Lord; step 2 was for a person to receive the Eucharist unworthily, without any repentance in his heart.

When I read this story about Voltaire the other day, I said, "Now, Lord, I understand. I understand why the faith of many Catholics is weak; I understand those polls which tell us that only a small percentage of Catholics accepts Church teaching on the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist; I understand why so many reject the authentic teaching of the Church on contraception and other moral issues; I understand these horrible priest scandals a little better; I understand why some priests preach their own version of the Gospel and not the one they’re mandated to preach by the Church. It’s because, in one way or another, they’ve all followed Voltaire’s Prescription. They may not have done it consciously, but they’ve done it nonetheless."

Think about it, my brothers and sisters:

What does it mean to receive the Eucharist in bad faith, without any intention of growing in one’s relationship with the Lord? For Voltaire’s disciple, it meant going to Communion regularly and openly professing disbelief. Now very few Catholics today go that far—I will admit that; but it’s clear from the polls that many Catholics today do receive Jesus in the Holy Eucharist while at the same time saying in their hearts, "I do not believe"—I do not believe in the Real Presence; I do not believe in the authority of the pope; I do not believe in hell or purgatory; I do not believe everything the Catholic Church authoritatively teaches in matters of faith and morals.

What Voltaire’s disciple did openly, they do internally.

Thus, they fulfill step 1 of his prescription for the destruction of their faith.

Step 2 involved receiving the Eucharist in the state of mortal sin. Concerning that issue, St. Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 11: "Whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily sins against the Body and Blood of the Lord. A man should examine himself first; only then should he eat of the bread and drink of the cup."

How many Catholics examine their consciences before they receive Communion? This is something I often think about as I distribute the Eucharist at Mass each week. I wonder how many people are actually receiving worthily! Let’s be honest about it: many mortal sins have now become mainstream in our culture: drunkenness, abortion, artificial contraception, sterilization, masturbation, missing Mass on a Sunday or holy day—to name but a few! Because these serious sins are so "mainstream," it’s very easy for Catholics to disregard them and come to Communion when they shouldn’t—just as Voltaire’s disciple disregarded his sins and continued to receive the Body and Blood of the Lord.

Of course, part of the blame here must go to those priests who don’t properly instruct their people on these matters! Sad to say, but some priests are much better at excusing sin than they are at preaching about it. And that’s a tragedy—as well as a terrible disservice to God’s people! Instead of helping the members of their flock to be holy, they’re helping them to fulfill step 2 of Voltaire’s Prescription!

[b]The Lord says to us in Isaiah 1: "Though your sins be like scarlet, they may become white as snow." God will forgive any and every sin a million times over, but for that to happen we must acknowledge the sin and seek the remedy: the Blood of Christ which washes away our sins in Baptism and in the sacrament of Reconciliation.

Some of you are struggling with serious sins in your lives right now, but you go to Confession often so that you’ll always be in the state of grace whenever you receive the Holy Eucharist. Please don’t think step 2 of Voltaire’s prescription applies to you, because it doesn’t! It applies only to those who knowingly commit serious sins—like Voltaire’s disciple—and then go to Communion, without prior Confession and without a firm purpose of amendment. And here’s the sad irony: every time these men and women receive the Eucharist in the state of mortal sin, they actually damage their faith instead of strengthening it.

Needless to say, that’s not the way it’s supposed to be!

In John 6, Jesus tells us about the power of the Holy Eucharist, a power he wants everyone to experience! In the excerpt from that chapter which we heard a few moments ago, he says, "I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world."

That is true, provided we receive the Eucharist in faith and in the state of grace![/b]
Let me conclude today with a story that illustrates this power beautifully:

At about the same time that Voltaire offered his infamous prescription to his disciple, Elizabeth, a young Episcopalian mother of five, took a trip with her husband William and oldest daughter to Italy. William’s business had been failing, his health had been deteriorating, and they thought a change of climate and scenery would help him both physically and emotionally. Tragically, however, William died in Pisa on December 27, 1803. Because Elizabeth and her daughter also became ill, it was 3 months before they could get back to the United States. Thankfully during that time they were well taken care of by an Italian family, the Filicchis, who had been business associates of William for a number of years.

The Filicchis were also devout Catholics.

For 3 months Elizabeth found herself deeply impressed by the way the members of this family practiced their faith. But what struck her most of all was their devotion to the Eucharist: their faithful attendance at Mass; the reverence they showed when they received Communion and returned to their pew to pray; the awe they exhibited toward the Blessed Sacrament when it was carried in procession on special feast days. And she began to sense that there was healing for her broken heart in this special sacrament.

Consequently, when she got back to the United States, she decided to convert to the Catholic faith. Later she described her First Holy Communion as the happiest moment of her life.

Such is the power of the Eucharist, when it’s received by people who have the right disposition of mind and heart! Like the Felicchis! Not only does it benefit the recipient spiritually and give that person eternal life as Jesus promised; receiving Communion with devotion can also help to the change hearts of others, and convert those who do not share our Catholic faith.

And, in the case of the Felicchis, their devotion to the Eucharist actually helped to make a saint!

Because the woman who stayed with them for 3 months in 1804 was none other than Elizabeth Seton: wife, mother of 5, widow, convert, the person often credited with starting the Catholic School System here in the United States, and the first native born American ever to be canonized by the Church. [/quote]

[Resurrexi]

Voltaire was a very wycked man!

[jezic]

let us spell things with "i". Y should not be used there.

It sounds like a good reflection and something that contains a lot of truth.

[Didacus]

Pauvre Voltaire.

Un tel philosophe et homme de talent admirer par plusieurs, mais qu'elle poids a ton ame?

[Thy Geekdom Come]

[quote name='jezic' post='958935' date='Apr 24 2006, 11:39 AM']
let us spell things with "i". Y should not be used there.

It sounds like a good reflection and something that contains a lot of truth.
[/quote]
Whi spell wyth "i"?

[blovedwolfofgod]

[quote name='StThomasMore' post='958870' date='Apr 24 2006, 08:37 AM']
Voltaire was a very wycked man!
[/quote]

Wicked yes, but the man was not dumb. He knew exactly how to do it. And he did it well. Wicked, but smart. Dangerous combination.

[dairygirl4u2c]

An atheist would say that the man was simply unaffirming through meditation his belief, the same way affirmed through meditation his belief. To the atheist and really in a way it really is psychological. It's all about what you choose to believe. You can choose to believe a lie, and it will happen. I personally don't believe it has to do with taking the Eucharist that way, but I could be sorely mistaken, I'll be the first to admit.

Edited April 24, 2006 by dairygirl4u2c

[blovedwolfofgod]

i suppose you have a point. the sacraments act ex opere opero (wrong spelling?) so the subjective experience may very well be in the mind. tho that they act ex opere operatis, it would stand to reason that the person is totally cut off from receiving grace and this is that which kills his faith. Cause isnt faith one of the strongest results of grace (besides our redemption)?

[ironmonk]

No... someone who is already an athiest wouldn't be taking the Eucharist.

Someone who is Catholic taking the Eucharist and doing what is described above is rebelling against God... not claiming atheism, if it was atheism there would be no need to do what Voltaire describes. Voltaire was evil... he obviously knew the damage it would cause. The person he told to do that knew that the Church is right... he commited spiritual suicide by taking the Eucharist unworthy.

It is not all in one's mind.

Athiests are dumb.

Please stick to the topic.

[Seven77]

fascinating...

"Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe"

[Seven77]

fascinating...

"Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe"

[dairygirl4u2c]

Is there a specific point that's being discussed? All I see are comments and affirmations, let alone anything close to a debate. I'm questioning the basic premise that it's the Eucharist taking wrongly that even caused problems to begin with. Anyways, here's one more point on that note.

[quote]How could he possibly rid himself of this unenlightened, superstitious belief in the presence of Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament? That was the question he posed to Voltaire.[/quote]

That doesn't sound like a "Catholic" or someone who knew the Church was right to me. It sounds like somebody who thinks what they believe is simply catching them psychologically.


On a more related topic from a more Catholic perspective, I do know a Monsignor who practiced canon law who said that it's not always wrong to partake of the Eucharist in mortal sin. He said that the person is weak when in the sin and needs sustenance. Now, I know the person committing the sins did not know whether or not the Church was true, so perhaps it wasn't truly a mortal sin since there wasn't full knowledge per se that it was a mortal sin. The monsignor never mentioned this notion as why he was allowed even though he was aware that was the person's situation. Maybe he forgot to say. All he said was the person was weak and needed sustenance. Whatever the case, he said that the person can partake if in the motions of the "sin", at least when the "sin" doesn't amount to full fledged rejection of what they knew to be true.

Edited April 25, 2006 by dairygirl4u2c

[ironmonk]

That "monsignor" is wrong and is going against Church teaching by saying that.

If someone needs "sustenance" then they can go to confession first. No other lawful way.

[Guest T-Bone]

[quote name='dairygirl4u2c' post='959579' date='Apr 24 2006, 06:10 PM']

On a more related topic from a more Catholic perspective, I do know a Monsignor who practiced canon law who said that it's not always wrong to partake of the Eucharist in mortal sin. He said that the person is weak when in the sin and needs sustenance. Now, I know the person committing the sins did not know whether or not the Church was true, so perhaps it wasn't truly a mortal sin since there wasn't full knowledge per se that it was a mortal sin. The monsignor never mentioned this notion as why he was allowed even though he was aware that was the person's situation. Maybe he forgot to say. All he said was the person was weak and needed sustenance. Whatever the case, he said that the person can partake if in the motions of the "sin", at least when the "sin" doesn't amount to full fledged rejection of what they knew to be true.
[/quote]

Names, please.

[Myles Domini]

Yes...it all makes sense! Thanks for posting that sermon.