MichaelFilo Posted April 21, 2006 Share Posted April 21, 2006 God created the world, and so it is thus... 6 days and it happened. But those cavemen... they really are uncharitably treated by the modern man. God bless, Mikey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 [quote name='StThomasMore' post='955725' date='Apr 20 2006, 11:02 PM'] The world is only 6000 years old... I hope this is not a thread supporting "Darwinian evolution" or any of those crackpot story tales that don't deserve to be called theories. [/quote] Yes, especially with all those fossils which are millions of years old to prove this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resurrexi Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 The fossils arent really that old. The scientists just use incorrect dating methods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 [quote name='StThomasMore' post='955738' date='Apr 20 2006, 11:18 PM'] I'd think you would be a strict creationist, also since you have the first five verses of the Genesis quoted in your sig, but because of your post above, I now think you are not. [/quote] I actually quoted John 1. I am an Augustinian evolutionist with Creation beginning it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resurrexi Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 You believe your ancestors to be dumb beasts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Now that would be Darwinian. I go back a little further than he. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resurrexi Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 Then what do you believe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 I'll find it for you either tonight or tomorrow. But it all boils down to I think God can intercede at conception and as far as animals go, he does there. I'm not sure what I believe about man's creation, though I do believe that was most definitely direct Divine intervention in creation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snarf Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 If a juvenile (in the literal definition) holds that Popes were only infallible until some arbitrary date, my guess is that he assumes that science is only plausible to a much earlier one. Say, when they shifted their focus away from turning lead into gold. What I love to see people forget is that the Old Earth theory predates Darwin by several decades, in its modern incarnation. Saying that scientists use faulty dating methods is like saying the Pythagorean Theorem is proved with questionable logic. You could argue against one case example until you're blue in the face (and probably just be wrong on all counts) and there'd still be countless more case examples to face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maria Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 How come The Everlasting Man hasn't been brought up yet? [url="http://www.worldinvisible.com/library/chesterton/everlasting/part1c2.htm"]http://www.worldinvisible.com/library/ches...ing/part1c2.htm[/url] [url="http://www.worldinvisible.com/library/chesterton/everlasting/part1c2b.htm"]http://www.worldinvisible.com/library/ches...ng/part1c2b.htm[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortnun Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 I'm just enjoying "listening" to this thread... [quote name='MC IMaGiNaZUN' post='956543' date='Apr 21 2006, 05:11 PM'] Since when was Holy Mother Church afraid of Science? We are not fundamentalists are we? [/quote] AMEN! [quote name='Snarf' post='956906' date='Apr 22 2006, 03:46 AM'] If a juvenile (in the literal definition) holds that Popes were only infallible until some arbitrary date, my guess is that he assumes that science is only plausible to a much earlier one. Say, when they shifted their focus away from turning lead into gold. What I love to see people forget is that the Old Earth theory predates Darwin by several decades, in its modern incarnation. Saying that scientists use faulty dating methods is like saying the Pythagorean Theorem is proved with questionable logic. You could argue against one case example until you're blue in the face (and probably just be wrong on all counts) and there'd still be countless more case examples to face. [/quote] Great points, Snarf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avemaria40 Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 I believe God could have used evolution. The point of Genesis was not to be a scientific account but to say that God made the world, that He created us and He found us to be very good. That's the heart of the message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blovedwolfofgod Posted April 22, 2006 Share Posted April 22, 2006 actually, my protestant heritage is coming to the front here... i tend toward strict Creationism, and the prots make a good case for it. i forget the one ministerial service that came to talk at the "christian" fellowship when i used to go (before they found out I was Catholic and NOT converting or convertable). There are actually a lot of really good points for Creationism... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now