Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Which astronomical system do you believe in?


Resurrexi

What of the following astronomical systems do you think is the most correct?  

58 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Mar 15 2006, 05:58 PM']What type of astronomical system do you believe in? We personally are a Geo-Centrist, and We are wondering what most phatmassers are.

Also, seeing as most helio-centrists do not believe the sun is the centre of the universe, but rather, the centre of the "solar system" we would like to, for the purposes of this pole, define helio-centrism as the belief that the earth revolves around the sun.
[right][snapback]912811[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

I believe in the heliocentric system. Do you have a link(s) that explain geocentrism? I would like to know how you explain parallax. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

[quote name='StThomasMore' date='Mar 15 2006, 05:58 PM']What type of astronomical system do you believe in? We personally are a Geo-Centrist, and We are wondering what most phatmassers are.

Also, seeing as most helio-centrists do not believe the sun is the centre of the universe, but rather, the centre of the "solar system" we would like to, for the purposes of this pole, define helio-centrism as the belief that the earth revolves around the sun.
[right][snapback]912811[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

The only people who describe themselves as "we" are royalty, editors, nutcases, and people with tapeworms.....

the earth is located in the quiet suburbs of our galaxy, expanding away just like its neighbors...off we go into the wild blue yonder :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brother Adam

[quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='Mar 20 2006, 08:55 AM']The only people who describe themselves as "we" are royalty, editors, nutcases, and people with tapeworms.....
[right][snapback]915509[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

We do not like your suggestion here. You will be assimilated. :ninja: :mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Desert Walker

The possibility that the universe has a fixed axis (central point of reference) potentially throws some of the assertions of the theory of relativity into question.

It also makes ancient cosmological models more accurate than those who discarded them might have realized.

Edited by Desert Walker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote]My understanding of the modern physics is that there is such thing as absolute space and time. The General and Special Theories of Relativity postulate that there is an absolute reference and it is where one is not acted upon by any forces.[/quote]

I'm not an expert so I could be wrong, but my understanding was that relativity's only constant is the speed of light. Nonetheless, the argument stands. It's impossibly to know whether the earth revolves around the sun, or vice versa; only relative motion can be observed. Copernicus is only accepted by virtue of the relative simplicity of the model compared with Aristotle's multiplicity of epicycles, or Tycho Brahe's rather baseless supposition that the [i]other[/i] planets revolve around the sun, whereas the sun revolves around the earth. However, simplicity does not always guarantee truth, so the truth is known only to God.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

[quote name='Brother Adam' date='Mar 20 2006, 09:18 AM']We do not like your suggestion here. You will be assimilated.  :ninja:  :mellow:
[right][snapback]915519[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
So you HAVE been eating raw pork??? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to General Relativity, it's totally arbitrary where the center of the universe is. If you were to go past the "borders" of the universe, there are a few theories as to what would happen, but the most popular belief is that you'd wind up at the opposite side of the universe like in Pac-Man. It's pretty difficult to visualize why this happens, but the same goes for everything else beyond quantum barrier tunneling. The universe IS NOT INFINITE. it's perfectly obvious that the present universe is expanding, and for an infinite structure to expand is just senseless.

As for Special Relativity, the only absolute is the speed of a body through spacetime. I feel like there was something else that was absolute, but I'd have to dig up my notes and it wasn't that important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, so few votes fro geocentrism. [url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/12/435-polled-on-catholic-apologetics.html"]Catholic Answers[/url] voted much differently.

See my three part series on geocentrism:

[b]Geocentricity 101: A beginner's Course[/b]

[url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentricity-101-part-i.html"]Part I Basic Principles[/url]
[url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentrism-101-part-ii.html"]Part II: Basic Physics[/url]
[url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentrism-101-part-iii-scriptural.html"]Part III: Scripture and Church Position[/url]
[url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/10/geocentricity-101-supplement.html"]Supplement: Church Position[/url]

Also, Robert Sungenis, Ph.D. and Robert Bennett, Ph.D will be releasing Part I of [i]Galileo Was Wrong[/i], very soon. This book will blow the lid off this issue. Keep an open mind, and read the book.

Mark Wyatt
www.veritas-catholic.blogspot.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geometrically in order for their to be a center there needs to be a designated perimeter. Are there walls to space? If there are, how can we be sure there isn't more on the other side of the walls?

If one can map an "ejection" of the different masses in the universe and can trace things back to an "origin" then this leads to a confirmation of the big-band theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Desert Walker

The Truth.

[img]http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/0893850284.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_V57104510_.jpg[/img]

Edited by Desert Walker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

EcceNovaFacioOmni

[quote name='Markjwyatt' date='Mar 26 2006, 08:37 PM']Wow, so few votes fro geocentrism. [url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/12/435-polled-on-catholic-apologetics.html"]Catholic Answers[/url] voted much differently.

See my three part series on geocentrism:

[b]Geocentricity 101: A beginner's Course[/b]

[url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentricity-101-part-i.html"]Part I Basic Principles[/url]
[url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentrism-101-part-ii.html"]Part II: Basic Physics[/url]
[url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentrism-101-part-iii-scriptural.html"]Part III: Scripture and Church Position[/url]
[url="http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/10/geocentricity-101-supplement.html"]Supplement: Church Position[/url]

Also, Robert Sungenis, Ph.D. and Robert Bennett, Ph.D will be releasing Part I of [i]Galileo Was Wrong[/i], very soon. This book will blow the lid off this issue. Keep an open mind, and read the book.

Mark Wyatt
www.veritas-catholic.blogspot.com
[right][snapback]923076[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
What is Sungenis' PhD in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...