Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Credible critique


Sojourner

Recommended Posts

Is it possible to provide a credible critique of a movie, piece of art, piece of music, television show, or book that you've never watched, read, or seen?

For example, I've never read the DaVinci Code ... can I still legitimately provide a critique of it and make definitive statements against it? Or does my ignorance of the work itself preclude me making a critique of it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homeschoolmom

Well, I guess it's possible to critique anything. However, you're more credible if you've seen the work in question.

If you said, "I've never seen the DaVinci Code. I don't even know what it's about," then your opinion is completely without merit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK. So could we perhaps say there are levels of credibility when it comes to expressing a viewpoint about a given book/movie/artwork/etc.?

Low credibility: Never read/watched it, don't know what it's about
Medium credibilitly: Heard about it from someone who has read it, haven't read it myself.
High credibility: Have read it, and consequently have formed opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homeschoolmom

I definately think the more you know about something the more credibilty you have-- I still might disagree with you, but I'm more likely to take your opinion seriously.

If Roger Ebert started writing his columns based on what he heard other critics saying about a movie, well....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='homeschoolmom' date='Mar 14 2006, 09:52 AM']I definately think the more you know about something the more credibilty you have-- I still might disagree with you, but I'm more likely to take your opinion seriously.

If Roger Ebert started writing his columns based on what he heard other critics saying about a movie, well....
[right][snapback]911147[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
I would totally agree.

Growing up, I can remember people in my church getting up-in-arms about various books/movies/etc. without having ever read/seen them. They'd base their opinions totally on the words of someone else, such as Focus on the Family. I have no problem with relying on others' opinions as you make decisions about what you partake of yourself, but to then espouse those opinions as your own without first having partaken seems a little disingenous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Sojourner' date='Mar 14 2006, 07:46 AM']OK. So could we perhaps say there are levels of credibility when it comes to expressing a viewpoint about a given book/movie/artwork/etc.?

Low credibility: Never read/watched it, don't know what it's about
Medium credibilitly: Heard about it from someone who has read it, haven't read it myself.
High credibility: Have read it, and consequently have formed opinion.
[right][snapback]911140[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Those standards are too low.

Zero credibility: never read/watched it, and are offering a critical opinion of it. And you're showing that you'll speak about things of which you're ignorant, so total credibility way down too.

Low credibility: Read/watched product in question. Okay, you know it, but who are you? What standards are you using to judge?

Medium credibility: You're familiar both with the specific material, and other materials in the category or genre.

High credibility: Fully familiar with the material, [i]and[/i] you are acquainted with other material in the same category/genre, [i]and[/i] you're a member of the target audience (meaning, this is the kind of thing you'd like, if it was well done).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='philothea' date='Mar 14 2006, 10:11 AM']Those standards are too low.

Zero credibility: never read/watched it, and are offering a critical opinion of it. And you're showing that you'll speak about things of which you're ignorant, so total credibility way down too.

Low credibility: Read/watched product in question.  Okay, you know it, but who are you? What standards are you using to judge?

Medium credibility: You're familiar both with the specific material, and other materials in the category or genre.

High credibility: Fully familiar with the material, [i]and[/i] you are acquainted with other material in the same category/genre, [i]and[/i] you're a member of the target audience (meaning, this is the kind of thing you'd like, if it was well done).
[right][snapback]911178[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
I can accept that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homeschoolmom

Okay... here's a thought... What about one's familiarity with theology? For example: I would take the opinion of a good and holy priest over that of someone else.

Just as a hypothetical example:
Let's say a new movie comes out on the subject of the occult or something similar. Let's say there are two critics-- a holy priest who has not seen the movie, but has read about it and Joe Blow movie goer who has. If the priest says I should avoid said movie, but Joe tells me he saw it and it's not a big deal, I'm more likely to listen to the priest. I tend to err on the side of caution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it depends.

Take "The Duh-Vinci Code" for example. You don't have to read the book to gets its propoganda. The only thing you'll get from reading the book is the literary elements that frame the propoganda. The propoganda is the same whether you read it in the book or you read it in a well researched critique.

If the objectionable material is more nuanced, for example, if a movie has a debated moral or whatever, and it's based on the story or the movie itself, then you should probably see the thing to offer a credible opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homeschoolmom

[quote name='Era Might' date='Mar 14 2006, 09:21 AM'] But you can't really say that unless you've followed it, and seen firsthand what it's all about, what the stories revolve around. etc.
[right][snapback]911192[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
A lot of television is like that. If you watch one episode of something, you don't see the character development that can be quite good. It sometimes takes many episodes to see where a storyline is going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='homeschoolmom' date='Mar 14 2006, 08:18 AM']Okay... here's a thought... What about one's familiarity with theology? For example: I would take the opinion of a good and holy priest over that of someone else.

Just as a hypothetical example:
Let's say a new movie comes out on the subject of the occult or something similar. Let's say there are two critics-- a holy priest who has not seen the movie, but has read about it and Joe Blow movie goer who has. If the priest says I should avoid said movie, but Joe tells me he saw it and it's not a big deal, I'm more likely to listen to the priest. I tend to err on the side of caution.
[right][snapback]911187[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Well, sure. I probably would too.

I would expect a holy priest to have got his opinion from a knowledgable source, and to be wise enough to couch his advice in, "I haven't seen this, but according to so-and-so, who is reliable because of this-and-that, I advise that you not see it."

That isn't technically criticism, though -- that's advice. If someone is saying the quality is good or bad, without having seen or read the stuff they're offering opinion on, I don't see any point in listening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='homeschoolmom' date='Mar 14 2006, 10:39 AM']A lot of television is like that. If you watch one episode of something, you don't see the character development that can be quite good. It sometimes takes many episodes to see where a storyline is going.
[right][snapback]911230[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Definitely.

It's like reading the book of Amos and saying you know all about the Bible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homeschoolmom

[quote name='Sojourner' date='Mar 14 2006, 10:17 AM']Definitely.

It's like reading the book of Amos and saying you know all about the Bible.
[right][snapback]911263[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Which is a least better than having read none of the Bible and saying that you've never read the Bible, but you know for a fact that it's carp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='homeschoolmom' date='Mar 14 2006, 11:19 AM']Which is a least better than having read none of the Bible and saying that you've never read the Bible, but you know for a fact that it's carp.
[right][snapback]911264[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
True. It is a step up. A baby step, if you will, but a step nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EcceNovaFacioOmni

I do it all the time! I don't know how many movies I have declared the "worst of all time" when I've never even seen it. Sometimes you don't have to see it to know it's bad:
[img]http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00008YRU0.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg[/img]

Edited by thedude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...