Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Bishop fulham is a former sede and is friends with feenyites so i am not so sure. i will have to call Bishop Macek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brendan1104 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Mar 6 2006, 08:35 PM']Bishop fulham is a former sede and is friends with feenyites so i am not so sure. i will have to call Bishop Macek. [right][snapback]904703[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I'm friends with Feeneyites, so what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 so the Bishop could be friends with sedes too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezic Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 what doesn't make sense is why you think this division in the Church is a good thing. The Creed has proclaimed since the beginning, I believe in ONE Holy, Catholic, and Apostalic Church. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 I do believe in ONE holy church. no one said it was a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 [quote name='jezic' date='Mar 6 2006, 07:39 PM']what doesn't make sense is why you think this division in the Church is a good thing. The Creed has proclaimed since the beginning, I believe in ONE Holy, Catholic, and Apostalic Church. [right][snapback]904708[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I dont understand it either. I guess if they wish to separate themselves from the Church, we cannot stop them. What is anything else worth if you are not in communion with the Church? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 not only am i in communion with the church, I practice the true faith, and i do not accept neo-catholic novelties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brendan1104 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Mar 6 2006, 08:39 PM']so the Bishop could be friends with sedes too. [right][snapback]904707[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I don't think he is... he doesn't like sedes... exposes them frequently, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 this is good. the bishop is not a feenyite though. youre not a feenyite are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brendan1104 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Feeneyite is a bad label. I hold all dogmas of the church. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 so you are a feenyite? do you believe in baptism of Blood and desire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezic Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Neo-Catholic novelties? regardless, i think that you should stop this thread where it is because there have been people who are scandalized by it. There are some on these boards who have never even heard of the SSPX and the division that is inherent actions of the SSPX and their rejection of papal jurisdiction and obedience to the pope disturbs these newcomers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dspen2005 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 [quote name='Extra ecclesiam nulla salus' date='Mar 6 2006, 04:29 PM']yes the NO mass is valid. I defiently think it is inferior though. [right][snapback]904379[/snapback][/right] [/quote] the current discipline of the Church seems to disagree with you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 im not in the SSPX. Im an indultarian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dspen2005 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 that's good... you absolutely disagree the schism wrought by SSPX and their pride in resisting the authority of the Holy Father. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts