Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Christology Final


Pio Nono

Recommended Posts

Laudate_Dominum

Faves..

[i]On the Unity of Christ[/i], by St. Cyril
[i]On the Incarnation[/i], by St. Athanasios
[i]Behold the Pierced One[/i], by Ratzinger
[i]Franciscan Christology[/i], by Damian McElrath
[i]The Hidden Center[/i], by Zachary Hayes
[i]Christ in Eastern Christian Thought[/i], by Meyendorff
[i]The Christological Controversy[/i], by Norris
[i]On the Cosmic Mystery of Jesus Christ[/i], by St. Maximos

Interesting..

[i]Christology of the Later Fathers[/i], by Edward R. Hardy (Editor)
[i]Two Ancient Christologies: A Study in the Christological Thought of the Schools of Alexandria and Antioch in the Early History of Christian Doctrine[/i], by Robert V. Sellers

Some Popular "Modern" Texts..

[i]Christology : A Biblical, Historical, and Systematic Study of Jesus Christ[/i], by Gerald O'Collins
[i]An Introduction to New Testament Christology[/i], by Raymond Brown
[i]Who Is Jesus?: An Introduction to Christology[/i], by Thomas P. Rausch
[i]Christ in Christian Tradition[/i], by Aloys Grillmeier
[i]Focus on Jesus: Essasy in Christology and Soteriology[/i], by Gerald O'Collins
[i]Incarnation[/i], by Gerald O'Collins
[i]Word Become Flesh: Dimensions of Christology[/i], by Brian O. McDermott
[i]An Introduction to Christology: In the Gospels & Early Church[/i], by Gerard H. Luttenberger

But if I was going to teach a class in Christology (God forbid) I would cover all of the definitive doctrinal formulations of the Church in chronological order supplemented with a historical survey and emphasis on key theologians. Thus I would also recommend scooping up Denzinger's (or at least Ott's text) and internalizing the dogmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='Feb 11 2006, 04:56 PM']Faves..

[i]On the Unity of Christ[/i], by St. Cyril :yes:
[i]On the Incarnation[/i], by St. Athanasios :yes:
[i]Behold the Pierced One[/i], by Ratzinger :yes :yes:
[i]Franciscan Christology[/i], by Damian McElrath :mellow:
[i]The Hidden Center[/i], by Zachary Hayes :mellow:
[i]Christ in Eastern Christian Thought[/i], by Meyendorff --- never read
[i]The Christological Controversy[/i], by Norris :mellow:
[i]On the Cosmic Mystery of Jesus Christ[/i], by St. Maximos --- never read

Interesting..

[i]Christology of the Later Fathers[/i], by Edward R. Hardy (Editor) :mellow:
[i]Two Ancient Christologies: A Study in the Christological Thought of the Schools of Alexandria and Antioch in the Early History of Christian Doctrine[/i], by Robert V. Sellers --- never read

Some Popular "Modern" Texts..

[i]Christology : A Biblical, Historical, and Systematic Study of Jesus Christ[/i], by Gerald O'Collins :mellow:
[i]An Introduction to New Testament Christology[/i], by Raymond Brown :no:
[i]Who Is Jesus?: An Introduction to Christology[/i], by Thomas P. Rausch :no:
[i]Christ in Christian Tradition[/i], by Aloys Grillmeier :mellow:
[i]Focus on Jesus: Essasy in Christology and Soteriology[/i], by Gerald O'CollinsĀ  --- never read
[i]Incarnation[/i], by Gerald O'Collins --- never read
[i]Word Become Flesh: Dimensions of Christology[/i], by Brian O. McDermott
[i]An Introduction to Christology: In the Gospels & Early Church[/i], by Gerard H. Luttenberger :mellow:

But if I was going to teach a class in Christology (God forbid) I would cover all of the definitive doctrinal formulations of the Church in chronological order supplemented with a historical survey and emphasis on key theologians. Thus I would also recommend scooping up Denzinger's (or at least Ott's text) and internalizing the dogmas.
[right][snapback]884061[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

God's Human Face would be on my list of Fav's as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laudate_Dominum

[quote name='Brother Adam' date='Feb 11 2006, 04:28 PM']God's Human Face would be on my list of Fav's as well.
[right][snapback]884069[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
good call. me too. :)

why the :mellow: smileys? Some of the books you mellowed out are phat. Although I agree about the one's that you put :no: next to, although they're worth engaging just because they're popular and you might have a discussion with someone who is liberal and it would be good to have some background on their approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know L_D you should like structure a complete scholarly reading list for every element of Dogmatic Theology. I'd be interested to see what you came up with, probably find lots of things to badger people into buying for me off of amazon :P:

Think about it, yes? :notworthy2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mellow, mainly in their overall value for someone interested in studying Christology, but not exshaustively. In other words I would encourage reading the ":yes:" books before the mellow books, especially if you ultimately had limited time and could only read a few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Myles' date='Feb 11 2006, 05:41 PM']You know L_D you should like structure a complete scholarly reading list for every element of Dogmatic Theology. I'd be interested to see what you came up with, probably find lots of things to badger people into buying for me off of amazon :P:

Think about it, yes? :notworthy2:
[right][snapback]884078[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

I utterly agree. :notworthy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laudate_Dominum

[quote name='Myles' date='Feb 11 2006, 04:42 PM']PS) Maybe the Noris is because it contains texts from the heresiarchs too? :idontknow:
[right][snapback]884079[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
I don't think you can adequately understand the structure of Christological doctrine (esp. from a historical perspective) without appreciating the heresies. I'd say that's a good thing. :idontknow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='Feb 11 2006, 05:46 PM']I don't think you can adequately understand the structure of Christological doctrine (esp. from a historical perspective) without appreciating the heresies. I'd say that's a good thing.Ā  :idontknow:
[right][snapback]884083[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

totally. We have to be able to distinguish for our exams the writings of the heretics and those who took positions against them for the Church based on short paragraphs from their works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laudate_Dominum

[quote name='Brother Adam' date='Feb 11 2006, 04:43 PM']Mellow, mainly in their overall value for someone interested in studying Christology, but not exshaustively. In other words I would encourage reading the ":yes:" books before the mellow books, especially if you ultimately had limited time and could only read a few.
[right][snapback]884080[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
well maybe I'm biased, but I would put the Franciscan Christology text near the top of the list. As far as the Theology of the Roman Catholic Church goes, I consider the Franciscan doctors to have had the most profound Christological insight. Patristically speaking I'd say the Greek Fathers are the bomb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laudate_Dominum

[quote name='Brother Adam' date='Feb 11 2006, 04:48 PM']totally. We have to be able to distinguish for our exams the writings of the heretics and those who took positions against them for the Church based on short paragraphs from their works.
[right][snapback]884085[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
that's phat.. gosh, do I miss school.. lucky ducks. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go, go Alexandria. I just wrote an essay on St Athanasius' understanding of the Incarnation. Can you believe some people dont believe 'The Father of Orthodoxy' posited a human nature in Christ? Are they really reading the same texts as I am?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laudate_Dominum

[quote name='Myles' date='Feb 11 2006, 04:51 PM']Go, go Alexandria. I just wrote an essay on St Athanasius' understanding of the Incarnation. Can you believe some people dont believe 'The Father of Orthodoxy' posited a human nature in Christ? Are they really reading the same texts as I am?
[right][snapback]884092[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
His treatise on the Incarnation is the bomb.. but I've always wanted to read his later treatise on the Incarnation. He wrote it after many more decades of contemplative illumination and the text itself was much longer. It is so sad that the text is lost.. I think he was so worried that heretics would misinterpret him (probably a fear born out of experience) that he would not let anyone make copies of the treatise. So sad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laudate_Dominum

[quote name='Myles' date='Feb 11 2006, 05:20 PM']Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo....you gonna make the reading list L_D? C'mon you know you want to! :yes:
[right][snapback]884145[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
haha! I'd love to, I just don't know when I'll have time.. The Aquinas reading list in the apologetics board is pretty good. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...