Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

The Jews


Extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Recommended Posts

What do you mean? Input on what? If you are asking who they are, then Jews were a group that followed the Mosaic Law and were the chosen people by God. However, once the Messiah came and the Jews rejected them, the covenent was ended and the New Covenent was established with the New Israel, the Church. Now, they are a religion that worship according to their ancient beliefs. Although, they have always had a special place, they are still not Christian, and we pray for the day of them to convert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can hold to the historical and traditional Christian opinion that rabbinical judaism started at the Council of Jamnia represents a break with the religion of the old testament and thus it is not the same religion while also realizing that because they LOOK TO the religion of the old testament they have a very similar religion which thus has many of the same merits of the religion of the old testament.

thus they do believe in some things that are revealed truths, but those truths weren't revealed through rabbinical judaism they were revealed through pre-Christian divine revelation in the Old Covenant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote]Could one say there relegion is evil becasue of what the Talmud says about Non-Jews?[/quote]
It is never our place to say that one religion is evil or another is not. We cannot know, and we should not risk calling evil, which may be graced by God, even if it's externally.

However, we can definitly say modern Jews are wrong. They do not just hold to heresies, but hold to wrong belief. And this we can say.

It is a fine line, but a very important one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course you can as a Christian.
I believe that Christ is God and accept the teachings of passed down through Apostolic Tradition. Jews deny this, so therefore they are wrong according to my belief. I'd expect them to say the same thing, and you know what they have.
If you hold a faith, would you not hold it as fact? I hold my beliefs as fact. Just because someone does not aggre with them, does not make my beliefs any less factual.
Furthermore, since this forum comes from a Christian, although Roman Catholic, background, therefore I have enough precedence to call part of Judaism wrong. This forum is based with the basic principles of Christianity being fiat.
And besides, I don't buy into that PC, Pluralism carp. I'll respect your beliefs, I may even admire parts of it, but I'm not going to say you're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It is not merely true that a creed unites men. Nay, a difference of creed unites men - so long as it is a clear difference. A boundary unites. Many a magnanimous Moslem and chivalrous Crusader must have been nearer to each other, because they were both dogmatists, than any two agnostics. "I say God is One," and "I say God is One but also Three," that is the beginning of a good quarrelsome, manly friendship." -GK Chesterton

people pretending they don't disagree by differentiating between "belief" and "fact" are really doing quite a disservice to the flavor of human life, friendship, and the brotherhood of men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

photosynthesis

[quote name='Aloysius' date='Jan 25 2006, 11:51 PM']"It is not merely true that a creed unites men. Nay, a difference of creed unites men - so long as it is a clear difference. A boundary unites. Many a magnanimous Moslem and chivalrous Crusader must have been nearer to each other, because they were both dogmatists, than any two agnostics. "I say God is One," and "I say God is One but also Three," that is the beginning of a good quarrelsome, manly friendship." -GK Chesterton
[right][snapback]866119[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
i love that quote!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

photosynthesis

[quote name='Krostandt' date='Jan 25 2006, 09:23 PM']What do you mean?  Input on what?  If you are asking who they are, then Jews were a group that followed the Mosaic Law and were the chosen people by God.  However, once the Messiah came and the Jews rejected them, the covenent was ended and the New Covenent was established with the New Israel, the Church.  Now, they are a religion that worship according to their ancient beliefs.  Although, they have always had a special place, they are still not Christian, and we pray for the day of them to convert.
[right][snapback]866016[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
I don't think the Jews' covenant with God ended when the Jews rejected Christ. To me, it doesn't depend on whether anyone accepts God. The New Covenent supercedes the Old Covenant because of its own nature -- Christ's blood on the Cross was the ultimate atonement for our sins. All other sacrifices are null and void except the sacrifice that is made in union with Christs'. Plus, the Old Covenant was only with the Jews and God, whereas the New Covenant was when God drew all nations to Himself.

Catholicism is the most authentic expression of Judaism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Krostandt' date='Jan 26 2006, 03:42 AM']Of course you can as a Christian.
I believe that Christ is God and accept the teachings of passed down through Apostolic Tradition.  Jews deny this, so therefore they are wrong according to my belief.  I'd expect them to say the same thing, and you know what they have.
If you hold a faith, would you not hold it as fact?  I hold my beliefs as fact.  Just because someone does not aggre with them, does not make my beliefs any less factual.
Furthermore, since this forum comes from a Christian, although Roman Catholic, background, therefore I have enough precedence to call part of Judaism wrong.  This forum is based with the basic principles of Christianity being fiat. 
And besides, I don't buy into that PC, Pluralism carp.  I'll respect your beliefs, I may even admire parts of it, but I'm not going to say you're right.
[right][snapback]866112[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

:applause:

Exactly. I have the absolute right to say someone else's religious beliefs are wrong and if other people think thats arrogant thats really their problem. Truth is one of the most obvious elements of nature, we perceive it every day in our experience of the world around us, to imagine that it doesn't carry over into religion, that reason is somehow suspended once we start thinking about religion inspite of the vying historical claims various religions make is intellectual flabbiness.

I am a Catholic Christian and that means I believe in the truth of Catholicism and will get into apologetic debates with anyone who doesn't believe in the truth of Catholicism. I dont hate non-Catholics but the fact remains I think they're wrong and if I didn't I wouldn't be a real Catholic because the Church does not present itself as a truth but as the truth, the light of the nations and the ark of salvation.

Judaism has much good in it but its obviously lacking the pleroma of Catholic Christianity like all other religions and if I didn't believe that I wouldn't be much of a Catholic. I'm not living under the dictatorship of relativism but under grace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the old covenant certainly did end in the sense that the Jewish people no longer have a special particular covenant apart from and running chronologically parallel to the new covenant. the Jews are invited into the New Covenant in order to fulfill all the aspiritions of the people of the old covenant, but they will never again hold a covenant

not even if Cardinal Kaspar says so. if anyone, even an Apostle himself, preaches a different gospel... well, you know the rest. Ratzinger vs. Kaspar, there's no question, there is no covenant running parallel to the New Covenant. The Gospel is that God has offered a covenant to everyone, without distinction to Jew and Gentile, and that is the only covenant offered to the human race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Myles' date='Jan 26 2006, 12:15 AM']Judaism has much good in it but its obviously lacking the pleroma of Catholic Christianity like all other religions and if I didn't believe that I wouldn't be much of a Catholic. I'm not living under the dictatorship of relativism but under grace.
[right][snapback]866309[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Isn't it a little early in the day to be using words like "pleroma"? :lol:

(Good morning, Myles :bye:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

photosynthesis

[quote name='Aloysius' date='Jan 26 2006, 02:16 AM']the old covenant certainly did end in the sense that the Jewish people no longer have a special particular covenant apart from and running chronologically parallel to the new covenant.  the Jews are invited into the New Covenant in order to fulfill all the aspiritions of the people of the old covenant, but they will never again hold a covenant

not even if Cardinal Kaspar says so.  if anyone, even an Apostle himself, preaches a different gospel... well, you know the rest.  Ratzinger vs. Kaspar, there's no question, there is no covenant running parallel to the New Covenant.  The Gospel is that God has offered a covenant to everyone, without distinction to Jew and Gentile, and that is the only covenant offered to the human race.
[right][snapback]866310[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
yes, but it didn't have anything to do with whether the Jews wanted the New Covenant or not.

Obviously the fact that Judaism abandoned the Messiah is an evil thing. However, I would never say that the religion is evil, because they are worshipping God in the way that they know how to. It is up to the Church to lead those who are in error into the light of Truth. My very good friend (who died last year) grew up in a Jewish home where no one was allowed to say the word "Jesus." It was a swear word in their family. He never knew who Jesus really was until very late in his life when he became Catholic. A lot of people in other religions are ignorant because they haven't gotten a clear picture of who Christ is, so we can't blame them for rejecting someone they never met. They are wrong, but ignorant and it is our responsibility to educate the ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='philothea' date='Jan 26 2006, 06:19 AM']Isn't it a little early in the day to be using words like "pleroma"? :lol:

(Good morning, Myles :bye:)
[right][snapback]866313[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

Its ne'er too early for words like pleroma 'thea.

Good morning to you too ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...