Catholicism Against Itself O.C. Lambert

[2tim215]

[Laudate_Dominum]

I've seen it and flipped through it, so I've read sections of it. Do you have a specific question about the anti-Catholic material presented in that text?
From what I've read of it I would describe it as a mediocre anti-Catholic tract. It is so filled with errors that I don't think it is possible to adequately respond the the text in one post, but if you'd like to go at it one step at a time feel free to post more questions.

My impression of the sections on Church history, the Church's view of the Bible, Catholicism as paganism, foolishness of the saints, forgeries, etc. was that it was so skewed and filled with distortions and misinformation that I feel safe in assuming the parts of the book that I didn't read are equally as lacking in credibility. The best advice I might have for someone who has felt challenged by a book such as this would be simply to study the faith. If you like I can put together a list of books which might fit well the subject matter presented that that text which would allow one to get "the Catholic side" of the story. Although, I'm not exaggerating when I say that the text in question so utterly lacks credibility and scholarly repute that I don't consider it to be a worthy challenge in the first place. It may perhaps be a step up from Boettner's book, but it is a small step.

And I doubt there is anything substantial in that text that you could not find an answer for in the phatmass [url="http://www.phatmass.com/directory/"]Catholic Defense Directory[/url].

God bless.