Church Punk Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 (edited) [url="http://sympaticomsn.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20051221/SCC_swingersruling_20051221"]http://sympaticomsn.ctv.ca/servlet/Article...ruling_20051221[/url] Unbelievable! Just another further downward spiral after making gay marriage legal in the country! [quote]Canada's top court says clubs that feature group sex and partner-swapping are perfectly legal. In its 7-2 decision released Wednesday, the Supreme Court of Canada said, because consensual sexual activity in a private club poses no threat to society, it shouldn't be considered criminal. The ruling sets a single standard, after lower courts went in opposite directions on two similar cases involving a pair of so-called 'swinger clubs' in Montreal. In one case, the owner of a singles club was convicted on two counts of keeping a common bawdy house and fined a total of $7,500. James Kouri's "Coeur a Corps" featured a dance floor around which a black curtain would swing every half hour. People hidden behind the drapery could then take part in or watch sex acts. In the other case, Jean-Paul Labaye, the owner of the members-only "liberated couples" club L'Orage was also convicted of keeping a bawdy house and fined $2,500. Members of Labaye's club could enter a locked room where they could participate in or watch sex acts.[/quote] Edited December 21, 2005 by Church Punk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didacus Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 (edited) carp! some punk just had to find out and post this.... Is there any positive way to describe where Canada is heading these days? Edited December 21, 2005 by Didacus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Well, there's an election coming up next month. The Conservatives have an outside chance. That's about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didacus Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 [quote name='Nathan' date='Dec 21 2005, 01:39 PM']Well, there's an election coming up next month. The Conservatives have an outside chance. That's about it. [right][snapback]832965[/snapback][/right] [/quote] thanks... I feel so encouraged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1337 k4th0l1x0r Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 You got me all excited talking about swingers and clubs. I thought this was a thread about golf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 [quote]In its 7-2 decision released Wednesday, the Supreme Court of Canada said, [b]because consensual sexual activity in a private club poses no threat to society[/b], it shouldn't be considered criminal.[/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zdog042 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Raphael, I hear you. all around. It doesn't affect society. That just makes me sad that people could believe that their actions won't affect others, even when it involves an extremely intimate action. Needless to say, I'd be mad if my fiance went to one of those, so it would affect me, and through me, society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lounge Daddy Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 [quote]Swinger's Sex Clubs now legal in Canada!, Can you believe this?[/quote] yes i can believe this - because Canada seems to be the liberal socialist playground so we need to stop this ideology here in the USA liberalism is a virus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socrates Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 [quote name='Lounge Daddy' date='Dec 21 2005, 09:34 PM']yes i can believe this - because Canada seems to be the liberal socialist playground so we need to stop this ideology here in the USA liberalism is a virus [right][snapback]833300[/snapback][/right] [/quote] What scares me is I look at Canada, and realize that this is the way the U.S. would become if the the liberal Democrats had unopposed power in this country. (And the more immoral legislation is passed in Canada, England, and other countries, the more impetus it will give American liberals to follow in their footsteps, "so we won't be behind the rest of the world.") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadreSantiago Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 this is so cool, where do I sign up for this thing I keep hearing about called Freedom? Canada you say? [img]http://moosecountry.com/images/mcprints/mc701.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 Freedom cannot be an end in itself. This leads to absurdism and "nausea" if you like Sartre. Man cannot be defined as freedom in some arbitrary and ultimately absurd sense. Only by discovering the realm of values does man's freedom find meaning. When a society proceeds according to the presupposition that there are no authentic values outside of the individual subjective perception (which is itself already an absurdity), such a society is on the road to ruin. It is values that bind a society, not the anti-value of relativism. If I may pontificate: the ultimate meaning and end of freedom is synergy with the Divine. Free-will is indicative of man's transcendent end; if freedom is not understood according to its nature as self-transcending, it cannot truly be called freedom, but is merely an absurd, animalistic enslavement. I'm done.. America.. Gotta love freedom of speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadreSantiago Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 I can't even reply to that, it's 2 am and I'm stoned so. I just want you to know that I mean freedom under the social contract. Meaning freedom as long as you don't infringe on others freedom. because consensual sexual activity in a private club poses no threat to society, it shouldn't be considered criminal. I think that pretty much sums it up. It's a private club where consensial sex takes place. It isn't criminal in any way and if it offends you, don't goto the club. I can't imagine any of yous guys going so why does this affect you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PadreSantiago Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 I wanted to add I live in dallas where certain strip clubs are practically whore houses. So do strip clubs upset you guys or does it just upset you when the government decides it's ok to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 [quote name='PadreSantiago' date='Dec 22 2005, 01:18 AM']I can't even reply to that, it's 2 am and I'm stoned so. I just want you to know that I mean freedom under the social contract. Meaning freedom as long as you don't infringe on others freedom. because consensual sexual activity in a private club poses no threat to society, it shouldn't be considered criminal. I think that pretty much sums it up. It's a private club where consensial sex takes place. It isn't criminal in any way and if it offends you, don't goto the club. I can't imagine any of yous guys going so why does this affect you. [right][snapback]833484[/snapback][/right] [/quote] haha, I just felt like spouting off a little.. it's late and I'm bored.. I wasn't really fishing for a debate. Although this is the debate table.. muahahaha.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted December 22, 2005 Share Posted December 22, 2005 [quote name='PadreSantiago' date='Dec 22 2005, 01:20 AM']I wanted to add I live in dallas where certain strip clubs are practically whore houses. So do strip clubs upset you guys or does it just upset you when the government decides it's ok to do? [right][snapback]833485[/snapback][/right] [/quote] both. such things offend the dignity of women, they threaten the family, encourage lust and other things which on a social level threaten the integrity of family, etc.. a government that can be so shallow and irresponsible has lost my confidence completely. They are encouraging the degradation of women, which in turn effects the way men perceive women (as objects, etc) this effects marital fidelity, and sexual promiscuity, etc. this effects the lives of our children.. Basically I don't see any way that such evils contribute any good to society, they are just destructive on many levels. Given that the family is already being systematically destroyed, it strikes me as odd that a government would think it wise to encourage and legitimize such things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now