Azriel Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 [quote name='philothea' date='Dec 16 2005, 07:53 PM'] I just feel sorry for the newbie. [right][snapback]828690[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I'm just glad someone got my joke. : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted December 17, 2005 Author Share Posted December 17, 2005 [quote name='Azriel' date='Dec 16 2005, 07:50 PM']Does any one else see this going downhill REALLY REALLY fast. I mean faster than Clark Griswald on a metallic saucer sled. [right][snapback]828687[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Yes. It was because when I brought it up in another thread I was told they didn't wanna discuss it anymore...and I honestly found it an inconsistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 One that you created. Nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted December 17, 2005 Author Share Posted December 17, 2005 Can anyone answer the question, though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 16 2005, 11:00 PM']Can anyone answer the question, though? [right][snapback]828737[/snapback][/right] [/quote] No, it can't be answered until the premise is stated properly. You have yet to ammend the premise so that it is a question that CAN be answered. Even then, once you do ammend your premise, hot stuff answered the question on the other thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted December 17, 2005 Author Share Posted December 17, 2005 What's unanswerable about it? Why is that paragraph not Magisterial? [quote]Even then, once you do ammend your premise, hot stuff answered the question on the other thread.[/quote] I don't find that answer satisfactory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 17 2005, 12:20 AM']What's unanswerable about it? I don't find that answer satisfactory. [right][snapback]828779[/snapback][/right] [/quote] You study philosophy. When the premise is flawed, the answer will not be valid and the answer will not be sound. I'm sorry that you don't find the answer satisfactory, but it is the truth. As I have said, I am not going to rehash this issue for a third time. You continually take it out of context and you continually misinterpret the view of Pope Benedict XVI. I have shown how. If you don't like it, that is fine, but just because you don't like it doesn't invalidate it. Your faulty premise does that all on its own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted December 17, 2005 Author Share Posted December 17, 2005 You're arguing something entirely different than hot stuff, methinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 17 2005, 01:06 AM']You're arguing something entirely different than hot stuff, methinks. [right][snapback]828814[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted December 17, 2005 Author Share Posted December 17, 2005 Oh well. By the way, you don't have to get involved in this discussion if you don't want. That's why it's in a different thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 17 2005, 01:16 AM']Oh well. By the way, you don't have to get involved in this discussion if you don't want. That's why it's in a different thread. [right][snapback]828822[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Riiiiiiigggghhhhtttt......we all know who this thread was aimed at. And it wasn't hot stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted December 17, 2005 Author Share Posted December 17, 2005 Actually, it was. It is best not to assume things like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam42 Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 17 2005, 01:22 AM']Actually, it was. It is best not to assume things like that. [right][snapback]828830[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Sure. You got it, champ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Dec 17 2005, 12:06 AM']You're arguing something entirely different than hot stuff, methinks. [right][snapback]828814[/snapback][/right] [/quote] nope Camster and I are on the same page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Just Posted December 17, 2005 Share Posted December 17, 2005 why interpretation? I dont want to sound mean but that reminds me of protestantism. too much interpretation, not enough of just plain ol' undestanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now