N/A Gone Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 what do u think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shortnun Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 The first time I experienced intinction was while doing mission work in Honduras. I think the combination of the lively (yet reverent and prayerful) attitude that was a part of every Mass leaves me to believe that this is a wonderfully prayerful way to receive the body and blood of our Savior. I recognize of course the cultural importance of this liturgical practice in Honduras. Wine is very costly. Honduras is the second poorest country in the Western hemisphere. Also, there is thread of the spreading of disease. And, I would not be surprised if North American bishops one day will have to examine the practice of common cup in light of diseases which can be spread as a result. Eagerly waiting to hear responses from others... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
friarMatt Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 it is a viable option for receiving communion as long as... YOU DON:T DO IT YOURSELF... In the eastern catholic churches I have attended, they always practice it. you approach for communion, open your mouth and it flipped into your mouth with a spoon...it was pretty cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Gone Posted December 2, 2005 Author Share Posted December 2, 2005 hmm, see I was told I could do it myself as long as I keep my hand so there is no crumbs and Im careful...im so confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cappie Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 Intinction. is one of the forms of receiving communion under both kinds referred to in the General Instruction of the Roman Missal. However, the way it must be done is strictly set down: "Each communicant, holding the paten under the chin, approaches the priest who holds the chalice. At his side stands a minister holding a vessel with the consecrated particles. The priest takes a host, dips part of it into the chalice, and, showing it says, The Body and Blood of Christ. The communicant responds, Amen, and receives the Sacrament in the mouth from the priest." (GIRM 2000 #287) It is the priest who takes the host and dips it into the consecrated wine, not the communicant. Liturgical law makes no provision for people to serve themselves communion. Receiving communion is not an individual, private affair. The tradition has always been to receive, not to take, communion. When people were allowed to choose communion in the hand, it was explicitly stated that “it is never permitted to place on the hand of the communicant the Host that has been dipped in the Lord’s Blood”. Communion in the hand therefore effectively precludes intinction as a way of receiving communion. Some people may believe that intinction is a more hygienic way of receiving the precious blood than drinking from the chalice. In fact, more germs are probably spread by communicants dipping bread that they have handled into the cup from which others will drink. The practice also introduces particles of wheat into the consecrated wine, endangering those coeliacs who cannot tolerate any gluten and who can receive the Body and Blood of Christ only from the cup. But, why not play it safe? Why is drinking from the cup so important? It has to do with the sacramental sign. These signs open up the mysterious and wonderful action of God in our midst. That is why we want to make our signs strong – so that they will bear the weight of the mystery they contain. And this is why we are invited to share communion under both kinds in the first place. The General Instruction states that: “Holy Communion has a more complete form as a sign when it is received under both kinds. For in this manner of reception a fuller light shines on the sign of the Eucharist banquet.” (GIRM 2000 # 281) Now the eucharistic sign is not just the bread and the wine. The sign is eating the bread and drinking the wine together at the Lord’s Table. With intinction, as with communion in the form of bread alone, the eucharistic sign is weakened. Drinking from the common cup is a powerful sign of our unity as brothers and sisters in Christ as we respond to the invitation of Jesus: “Take this, all of you, and drink from it.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phatcatholic Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 excellent response cappie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Gone Posted December 2, 2005 Author Share Posted December 2, 2005 great im in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paphnutius Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 Why are you in trouble? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phatcatholic Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 he's "in trouble" b/c he's been doing the intinction himself instead of receiving from the priest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paphnutius Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 And the priest allowed this?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phatcatholic Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 ......apparently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now