qfnol31 Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 I'm curious what you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 I'm quite Bonaventurian when it comes to this question. I say no way man!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted September 10, 2005 Author Share Posted September 10, 2005 I probably should mention that the rest of the answers (beyond the first word) are just witty humour, and nothing else. : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philothea Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 Please define your terms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 Theology is the queen of the sciences, philosophy is the handmaid of Theology, and natural philosophy (aka science) is arranged hierarchically below the higher branches of philosophy (namely metaphysics).. Call me a medieval if you will. I am not ashamed. : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted September 10, 2005 Author Share Posted September 10, 2005 [quote name='philothea' date='Sep 10 2005, 02:57 AM']Please define your terms. [right][snapback]717913[/snapback][/right] [/quote] May I be funny? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philothea Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Sep 10 2005, 03:02 AM']May I be funny? [right][snapback]717916[/snapback][/right] [/quote] If you like, though I am beginning to get irritated for the first time ever on Phatmass, so I can't promise to be amused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted September 10, 2005 Author Share Posted September 10, 2005 Oh, I'm sorry. Why is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hierochloe Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 My opinion: I think science has a seperate and distinct objective from philosophy, as well as different (some might claim more stringent) requirements in establishing itself as fact. These requirements are met using the scientific method. Philosophy is less constrained by physical and mathematical proofs, and rather relies more upon logic built upon concepts of faith. As a result, it is very well suited to explain things that are not definable by these same proofs, such as the supernatural. I think it is a truly beautiful thing when science and philosophy find common ground in which they compliment each other. However, this very juncture is frought with misleading conclusions that members of every cause will exploit to further their own interpretations of reality. To be fair, I also see this realm as one of the most entertaining and challenging of any for discussions in which one may engage with another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philothea Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 [quote name='qfnol31' date='Sep 10 2005, 03:08 AM']Oh, I'm sorry.  Why is that? [right][snapback]717920[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I'm just being oversensitive. I'm sure you know the topic that's bothering me (as it inspired this one). Blah. Anyway, do tell me your definitions, cause I can't vote otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted September 10, 2005 Author Share Posted September 10, 2005 Well, I was going to be sarcastic (I've read too much Bacon this week, and since I can't eat any, his name has caused me to go overly hungry all week, craving some nice bacon......) J/K. : They're pretty much what you think of them: Science is the study of physics, metaphysics, math, etc. Philosophy is the study of wisdom and such...don't know how much to say here quite yet, but I guess the standard definition of philosophy. And I can't think of anything else... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philothea Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 Alrighty then... I vote maybe! But I will have to explain tomorrow because it's already way past my bedtime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted September 10, 2005 Author Share Posted September 10, 2005 Besides being Catholic, I have a huge interest in this. That actually mostly because I'm a philosophy major and I'm studying, right now, the differences between the Presocratics and Bacon (Ancient and Early Modern Philosophies). I've actually gotten pretty tired of Bacon, and am really sad because almost everyone today thinks in the Modern mindset, though they don't realize it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hierochloe Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='Sep 10 2005, 02:59 AM']Theology is the queen of the sciences, philosophy is the handmaid of Theology, and natural philosophy (aka science) is arranged hierarchically below the higher branches of philosophy (namely metaphysics).. Call me a medieval if you will. I am not ashamed. : [right][snapback]717915[/snapback][/right] [/quote] That's an interesting classification and I agree with it in the sense of how inclusive each field, as it were, is regarding aspects of reality that they address. For example science, being on the lowest rung, attempts to explain only physical reality. As one ascends the hierarchy, more, deeper aspects of reality are addressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted September 10, 2005 Share Posted September 10, 2005 [quote name='hierochloe' date='Sep 10 2005, 03:16 AM']Philosophy is less constrained by physical and mathematical proofs, and rather relies more upon logic built upon concepts of faith. As a result, it is very well suited to explain things that are not definable by these same proofs, such as the supernatural. [/quote] As soon as you bring faith into the picture you are not doing philosophy. You can philosophize about faith, its nature and what not, but if you presuppose faith you are violating the methodology proper to philosophical investigation. When presuppositions of faith are involved you are technically doing Theology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now