zabbazooey Posted August 23, 2005 Share Posted August 23, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted August 23, 2005 Share Posted August 23, 2005 no i wasn't someone asked me why i believed in geocentrism. so i stated why except i did debate a little but it is a stupid debate about science which has nothing to do with Catholicism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReinnieR Posted August 23, 2005 Share Posted August 23, 2005 you think scince hsa nothing to do with Catholicism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted August 23, 2005 Share Posted August 23, 2005 not particularly.... Catholicism is more faith based. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paladin D Posted August 23, 2005 Author Share Posted August 23, 2005 Thanks for de-railing the thread people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReinnieR Posted August 23, 2005 Share Posted August 23, 2005 [quote name='Paladin D' date='Aug 22 2005, 11:51 PM']Thanks for de-railing the thread people. [right][snapback]695166[/snapback][/right] [/quote] i'm sorry man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman82 Posted August 23, 2005 Share Posted August 23, 2005 EENS, The purpose of the bible is faith/morals/salvation history, not science. BTW, when do you start high school? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paladin D Posted August 24, 2005 Author Share Posted August 24, 2005 [url="http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=70808"]http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=70808[/url] Karl Keating replied to the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted August 24, 2005 Share Posted August 24, 2005 [quote]BTW, when do you start high school?[/quote] 2 weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus Posted August 27, 2005 Share Posted August 27, 2005 bump for karl keating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benedict Posted August 27, 2005 Share Posted August 27, 2005 I never even heard of people believing in geocentrism until Sungenis started pushing/defending it. I find it implausible. Anyone who loves physics might enjoy [url="http://catholicoutlook.com/geocentrism.php"]these debates[/url] featuring Gary Hoge, "the man" when it comes to helio-geocentrism debates. As far as I have seen, Mr. Sungenis' arguments have come down to "you can't prove with certainty that geocentrism is wrong", leaving nothing but the seemingly endless flood of evidence that shows it to be highly unlikely compared to heliocentrism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
argent_paladin Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 You know, the debate on the merits of geocentrism doesn't show how Karl Keating's denial of a young earth can possibly be anti-geocentrist. They are two different things and not logically related to one another. They are only related because the both depend on a very literal reading of scripture and a firm denial of modern cosmological theory. But my question is, you said that Keating was anti-geocentric, but offered evidence only that he was anti-young earth. Did you mix up your terms? Or did you mix up the citations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now