dairygirl4u2c Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 The Supreme Court nominee, John Roberts, is a Catholic! Have at it... (ie. speculate, discuss, assert, refute, debate, argue, bicker, disparage, demonize, slant, skew, distort, umm.. that's enuff...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peach_cube Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 [quote name='dairygirl4u2c' date='Aug 1 2005, 03:46 PM']The Supreme Court nominee, John Roberts, is a Catholic! Have at it... (ie. speculate, discuss, assert, refute, debate, argue, bicker, disparage, demonize, slant, skew, distort, umm.. that's enuff...) [right][snapback]667379[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Homosapien..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 bipedal mammal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socrates Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 (edited) [quote name='dairygirl4u2c' date='Aug 1 2005, 01:46 PM']The Supreme Court nominee, John Roberts, is a Catholic! Have at it... (ie. speculate, discuss, assert, refute, debate, argue, bicker, disparage, demonize, slant, skew, distort, umm.. that's enuff...) [right][snapback]667379[/snapback][/right] [/quote] The Supreme Court nominee, John Roberts, is a Catholic! Allelujah! Edited August 2, 2005 by IcePrincessKRS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peach_cube Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 I like my idea better. John Roberts is a .... that makes the pro-aborts go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sirklawd Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 OOOOOOO madlibs, UM.. lesseee.....you want a noun..."CARROT CAKE" now read it back to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matty_boy Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 Rick Santorum said on the Michael Medved show that John Roberts is the real deal. Coming from Rick Santorum, I'd believe just about anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thy Geekdom Come Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 [quote name='Sirklawd' date='Aug 1 2005, 09:52 PM']OOOOOOO madlibs, UM.. lesseee.....you want a noun..."CARROT CAKE" now read it back to me! [right][snapback]667994[/snapback][/right] [/quote] My mother was reading an article on him and told me that his friends and colleagues say he's always the most brilliant man in the room, and yet, very humble. Given that arrogance is the main cause of recent Supreme Court decisions, I think he's a perfect candidate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna Posted August 7, 2005 Share Posted August 7, 2005 ....schwell feller....? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael D. Posted August 7, 2005 Share Posted August 7, 2005 (edited) i don't think that he will be able to push through all of the things conservatives want... but he seems like a smart dude and thats the most important bit. in the ideal situation his catholicsm shouldn't ever affect his decisions... so i guess it shouldn't matter what he is. Edited August 7, 2005 by Michael D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birgitta Noel Posted August 7, 2005 Share Posted August 7, 2005 His wife is a member of Feminists for Life! YAY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna Posted August 7, 2005 Share Posted August 7, 2005 [quote name='Michael D.' date='Aug 7 2005, 12:25 AM']...in the ideal situation his catholicsm shouldn't ever affect his decisions... so i guess it shouldn't matter what he is. [right][snapback]675562[/snapback][/right] [/quote] In the ideal situation, Catholicism should always affect all our decisions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael D. Posted August 7, 2005 Share Posted August 7, 2005 But as a justice it's not a decision, he is just inturpreting the Constitution, and act that doesn't really involve his personal feelings or attitudes toward anything. It is just reading the Constitution and applying it to laws today. For example, if he hated the fact that the KKK can say whatever it wants to under the 1st Amendment, he can't do anything about it because the Constitution is clear on the subject of free speech and press. He can't do what he wants, he is bound by the Constitution and what it says. His job is to hold up the Constitution, so he can't allow his personal convictions to override what the Constitution actually says. He will never get to be a justice if he goes in to it with an agenda, he wouldn't even be a judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna Posted August 7, 2005 Share Posted August 7, 2005 Now, you're talking about the [b]real [/b]world. In your previous post, you said, "in the [b][i]ideal[/i][/b]..." In an ideal world, we'd all adhere to Catholic Truth... Something to look forward to in heaven!!! "Whatsoever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven - Whatsoever you loose on earth, will be loosed in heaven." Even if the world rejects Catholic Truth, heaven won't!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kateri05 Posted August 7, 2005 Share Posted August 7, 2005 (edited) exactly. and NOWHERE in the constitution is there a right to privacy NOR a right to take the life of unborn children. luckily he is a man who INTERPRETS law and doesn't make up his own to push his own agenda Edited August 7, 2005 by kateri05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now