journeyman Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcceNovaFacioOmni Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 Enough with the shameless bumping. Some people... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 [quote name='thedude' date='Jul 30 2005, 10:26 PM']Enough with the shameless bumping. Some people... [right][snapback]665850[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 PSPX for King of the Sea!!! Oh wait. He already has that designation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 [quote name='popestpiusx' date='Jul 31 2005, 12:10 AM']PSPX for King of the Sea!!! Oh wait. He already has that designation. [right][snapback]665930[/snapback][/right] [/quote] Ya know, I can't recall seing posts by you that are 'phishy'. I just remember our great discussions in days gone by... But I was gone for a good while. If I was the big boss, I'd consider you for Church Scholar. I'd throw out an official nomination but it would likely fall flat on its face since you have the Phishy title. I wanna PM you and find out what's up with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 it won't let me PM you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 I can't use the PM thing while designated a smelly phish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 [quote name='popestpiusx' date='Jul 31 2005, 12:22 AM']I can't use the PM thing while designated a smelly phish. [right][snapback]665937[/snapback][/right] [/quote] I'm hijacking this thread, but I don't feel bad because psspx can't get PM's-- therefore: do you believe in any of the following: 1. the novus ordo is invalid 2. vatican II is heretical and/or invalid 3. the seat is vacant 4. non-catholics go to hell. no questions asked (you know what I mean) 5. other stuff like that 6. all of the above I'm just curious because I can't remember seeing anything along those lines from you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 My positions on all those are well known. I would want to qualify my answers for the sake of precision, but the simple answer is: no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReinnieR Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 [quote name='popestpiusx' date='Jul 31 2005, 12:22 AM']I can't use the PM thing while designated a smelly phish. [right][snapback]665937[/snapback][/right] [/quote] aww i didn't know it was like that i'm sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 [quote name='popestpiusx' date='Jul 31 2005, 12:29 AM']My positions on all those are well known. I would want to qualify my answers for the sake of precision, but the simple answer is: no. [right][snapback]665940[/snapback][/right] [/quote] well I nominate you for normality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReinnieR Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='Jul 31 2005, 12:34 AM'] well I nominate you for normality. [right][snapback]665942[/snapback][/right] [/quote] i second taht Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 Let me briefly adress each question, since no one else is awake and we have successfully hijacked this thread. 1)In itself, no. 2)No. I think the bishops were manipulated to accept ambiguous or reckless language on a few points that would later be abused but I do not believe the Council was heretical or invalid, per se. 3)Hell no. 4)This requires all sorts of qualification but since we both know what you mean here I will leave it with a simple no. 5)uhh, not sure. 6)See above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 [quote name='popestpiusx' date='Jul 31 2005, 12:35 AM']Let me briefly adress each question, since no one else is awake and we have successfully hijacked this thread. 1)In itself, no. [/quote] Me too [quote]2)No. I think the bishops were manipulated to accept ambiguous or reckless language on a few points that would later be abused but I do not believe the Council was heretical or invalid, per se. [/quote] Me too [quote]3)Hell no. [/quote] Me too [quote]4)This requires all sorts of qualification but since we both know what you mean here I will leave it with a simple no. [/quote] Me too [quote]5)uhh, not sure. [/quote] not sure [quote]6)See above. [/quote] yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcceNovaFacioOmni Posted July 31, 2005 Share Posted July 31, 2005 I think pspx arrived at a bad time. I believe he came around the time that the Markich brothers (now banned) came, and got bunched up with them as pseudo-trads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now