Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

L & T describes her faith


Anastasia13

Recommended Posts

Anastasia13

Interesting reply Brother Adam, although some of that I would disagree with.

[quote name='dUSt' date='Jul 24 2005, 01:49 PM']I have one question for you.

[i][b]IF[/b] God left us an authority here on earth that could guide us without error in our interpretation of the Bible, would you want to know about it?[/i][right][snapback]657171[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
If it was clearly shown in scripture, then yes. If it adds to scripture what is not shown in scripture, then no because I don’t believe it would be real. If you mean in a tangible sense, then it is through imperfect humans and is not itself scripture, then it may still be imperfect. If you mean the Holy Spirit, then I believe that is pretty clear in John 16:13-14.

[quote name='dUSt' date='Jul 24 2005, 01:49 PM']Sometimes we must conform ourselves to the truth rather than conforming the truth to ourselves. ;)
[right][snapback]657171[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
The truth of that statement is what stopped me when I seriously thought about converting two and a half years ago.

Edited by Light and Truth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

photosynthesis

[quote name='Light and Truth' date='Jul 24 2005, 05:40 AM']My church does baby dedications and then later does baptism which I think is ok. I think baby baptism, like what I had, is ok but I don't accept infant baptism and nothing more but I think that confirmation serves as an affirmation of baptism as is the Lutheran view. [right][snapback]656584[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
so...you think baby baptism, like what you had, is ok... but you don't accept infant baptism?

what's the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Open Mic, not the Debate Table. If you guys want to start discussing/debating, do it at the table.

Glad you're with us, [b]Light and Truth[/b]. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anastasia13

[quote name='Paladin D' date='Aug 8 2005, 10:18 PM']This is the Open Mic, not the Debate Table.  If you guys want to start discussing/debating, do it at the table.[right][snapback]677904[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
That is where I first posted it. *shrug*

[quote name='Paladin D' date='Aug 8 2005, 10:18 PM']Glad you're with us, [b]Light and Truth[/b]. :)
[right][snapback]677904[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Thank you. I'm glad to be here.

Edited by Light and Truth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anastasia13

[quote name='photosynthesis' date='Aug 8 2005, 10:13 PM']so...you think baby baptism, like what you had, is ok...  but you don't accept infant baptism?

what's the difference?
[right][snapback]677901[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Confirmation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

photosynthesis

the difference between baby baptism and infant baptism is confirmation? what? that makes no sense. it seems like you were ok with "baby baptism" but not ok with "infant baptism," when they are the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anastasia13

[quote name='photosynthesis' date='Aug 9 2005, 04:52 AM']the difference between baby baptism and infant baptism is confirmation?  what?  that makes no sense.  it seems like you were ok with "baby baptism" but not ok with "infant baptism," when they are the same.
[right][snapback]678061[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Between infant baptism and baby baptism in what I was saying, the only difference as far as I meant was just different words for what I understood to be the same thing. In whether or not I agree with it, I think there should be something later, like confirmation. I think baby baptism, like what I had, is ok but I don't accept baby baptism and nothing more. I think that confirmation serves as an affirmation of baptism as is the Lutheran view.

Edited by Light and Truth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Brother Adam' date='Aug 3 2005, 11:20 AM']L&T,[right][snapback]669977[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
One other thing on that, I don't see it making sense that Jesus would change what he was talking about so that He would go from talking about blood to then talking about wine in Matthew 26:26-29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thy Geekdom Come

[quote name='Light and Truth' date='Aug 16 2005, 06:41 PM']I also believe that the only real mortal sin is more like disbelief.
[right][snapback]686982[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

Just as faith leads to virtuous acts, disbelief leads to sinful acts. If disbelief is mortal sin, then certainly the acts that stem from it are also mortal sin.

Now the question you've got to ask yourself is...are the sins Catholics traditionally call mortal the kinds of things a believer would do, or a disbeliever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Raphael' date='Aug 16 2005, 04:48 PM']the sins Catholics traditionally call mortal[right][snapback]686989[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Those are pride, avarice, lust, envy, gluttony, anger, and sloth, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...