Will you still approve of W

[Socrates]

[quote name='Good Friday' date='Jul 19 2005, 09:48 PM'][b]"Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land. ... There’s nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent.”[/b]

I told all of you this would happen back during the election, that Bush would not appoint a pro-life justice to the Supreme Court.  No one listened to me.  And yet, I was right.

The comments he made [i]against[/i] Roe v. Wade, he made as a political appointee -- he was making them on behalf of the first Bush administration.  On the other hand, the comments he made to the Senate Judiciary Committee . . . "law of the land" . . . "precedent" . . . these were his own words.  He is pro-choice, and this is, frankly, what all of you deserve for reelecting President Bush and not paying attention to voices of reason.
[right][snapback]650516[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

Undoubtably, if Kerry were in the Whitehouse instead, he'd be choosing 100% prolife nominees, and would be working his hardest to end Roe v. Wade! (With the full backing of his party, who've been doing their damnest to get Bush to appoint pro-life judges!)

Yes, If only we'd listened to the "voice of reason" and voted Kerry!

Edited July 20, 2005 by Socrates

[Cam42]

[quote name='hot stuff' date='Jul 20 2005, 11:02 AM']Absolutely!! And I couldn't be happier about that! 

While I will be critical of W from time to time, I will also give him his due respect. 

Picking a juror without a large paper trail but still qualified was a brilliant political move!
[right][snapback]650914[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

Yes, but is he a failure? He doesn't seem too keen on public dissention from the judicial answer concerning Roe v. Wade.

That is the impending question now isn't it?

[Jaime]

Of course it is!! We don't actually know.

However his wife is a member of an organisation called "Feminists for Life" which is a pro life group

That's why I suggest prayers!!