Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Execute Them!


Aloysius

Recommended Posts

Q the Ninja

[quote name='damu' date='Apr 25 2005, 08:05 AM'] [b][color=red]Rule #5. Thou shall not kill[/color].[/b] [/quote]
I want to clarify the Catholic position on this. If this meant no killing as we know it, then war would be immoral (and indeed oftentimes it is). But yet, God allowed, and even commanded, the Israelites to war. God cannot contradict himself, so this means that our interpretation is probably wrong.

However, killing is a grave act, and must be done with care; no malice, no intent of the death of the person can be willed. Otherwise it's an evil act.

That last part is the same principle that changes allowing someone to die (as the Pope) and willing the person to die (like Terry Schiavo).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus Freak

No, i do not believe that they should be treated with the death penalty. If we have them killed, then we are not better than them. We are supposed to have mercy. Just throw them in jail. Besides, considering that they are going around raping and killing people i do not think they want to reconcile with God. They have already turned their backs on God.


think about it?

Freak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MichaelFilo

God never turns His back on anyone, however. God always calls his children, and people change, even unto the point of death (the Good thief).

For the translation of kill, it is more properly rendered murder, but that would cause more confusion than kill. The killing is unlawful here, but certain powers have the authority to command the death of someone, but they can also abuse tha tpower and therefore make it unlawful (in the Eyes of God).

God gave this power to governments, when he proclaimed that the power to kill him and to let him live were given from God. God also had rules in which killing a member of the early Jewish communities was lawful and to be carried out. These conditions were plentiful. Sometimes, there is more mercy in killing someone then allowing them to commit more actions that would beaver dam them. Besides, as before mentioned, a visible end to your life will cause much thinking.

God bless,
Mikey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q the Ninja

[quote name='MichaelFilo' date='Apr 27 2005, 03:56 PM']For the translation of kill, it is more properly rendered murder, but that would cause more confusion than kill. The killing is unlawful here, but certain powers have the authority to command the death of someone, but they can also abuse tha tpower and therefore make it unlawful (in the Eyes of God).[/quote]

That I can agree with, but I like kill because it is a warning how grave killing is.

Also, murder is intentionally killing someone who has the right to live (if I remember correctly).

Edited by Q the Ninja
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MichaelFilo

Kill is probably more approrpriate. But the verb that means kill in Greek (like Latin) has a different meaning (there are many words that mean kill) than just kill. That is why I find kill to not be enough of a translation, I guess?

God bless,
Mikey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MichaelFilo

I believe we do.

By the way, Jesus Freak, we are better than no one. All humans are not better than any other human, or at least they didn't consider themselves thus. The Virgin Mary, kept without sin, would be sinning if she were to fall into the sin of pride by saying she is better, for she is only better because of God, and thus is not truely better because of Herself. The point, we arne't better than the criminals if we let them live or kill them.

God bless,
Mikey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus Freak

How is Mary sinless? I don't understand this one... She was only sinless in the fact that she was a virgin when she had Jesus...or so I( & Protestants in general i believe) believe. There was only one person to ever walk the face of the earth as perfect/sinless and that was Jesus.


Now i'm ready for the Catholics to criticize me on this...

Freak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MichaelFilo

While one of the best Marian apologists isn't here (Laudate_Dominus?) I'll give it my best shot. However, not in this thread, it doesn't belong here. I'll quote you and post a reply in another thread. We can continue there.

God bless,
Mikey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'm surprised to hear so many votes in favor of the death penalty for pedophiles on a Catholic Phorum, but hey, this is the U.S. It's a tough discussion, I know, but I think it's pretty clear what the Church teaches as far as the death penalty goes, and as heinous a crime as pedophilia is, I seriously doubt the Roman Catholic Church would support killing a pedophile. I'm also surprised to hear all the talk about castration, as if you guys haven't noticed that many of the high profile cases about pedophilia recently have involved female school teachers and young boys. Now, if the criminal is a woman, are we as quick to say "kill her"? I seriously doubt it. And what body part should we cut off of the female child molesters? Best to go with Church teaching here, as it is Universal and applies equally to everyone. Lock them up and throw away the key, and provide plenty of Scripture so they can work out their salvation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don John of Austria

[quote name='hot stuff' date='Apr 22 2005, 08:47 AM']
Including the 15 year old that has an abortion?

Life imprisonment is (in my opinion) appropriate for pedophiles. Although I think in some rare cases, castration is effective as well. [/quote]
Yes includingthe 15 year old who has an abortion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don John of Austria

[quote name='Matt Black' date='Apr 25 2005, 06:10 AM'] The problem with making any crime other than murder (eg: rape, paedophilia) a capital crime is that it removes any disincentive on the part of the offender to spare the life of his victim ie:" if I'm going to fry for rape, I might as well go all the way and kill her too, as I've nothing to lose and in fact that might make my crime more difficult to detect". That's a major problem.

Anther problem that springs to mind is the definition of a paedophile. In the UK (where I am), technically a 16 year old who has sex with his 15-year old girlfriend is guilty of a paedophilic crime and has to go on the Sex Offenders' Register if convicted. Obviously there is a world of difference between such an individual and a fifty-something pervert who 'grooms' his 10-year old victims on a serial basis. The law would need to very carefully distinguish between such scenarios.

Yours in Christ

Matt [/quote]
Historicly this was not the case, many rapes occured in places where that was a capital crime which where not Rape murders, as a matter of fact I have never seen any evedince that this had any impact at all. Murder is a completly differant thing from rape and most rapist would not choose to kill their victim just because it is more convienent.


Now as for th Age thing I completly agree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='Apr 27 2005, 06:06 PM'] Cardinal Dulles disagrees with you.
He said knowing the date of your death can wonderfully focus your mind on the last things. :) [/quote]
I can appreciate what he is saying here, but I don't agree with us being the ones to hand out that person's date of death.

*shrug* But then again, I am one of those people who is against capital punishment in all cases. I think there are treatments out there that can help and that people can change. Must be the psychologist in me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmotherofpirl

Must be. :)

I think if you deliberately takes the life of an innocent, you forfeit your own.

I do not think think pedophiles should be executed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MichaelFilo

I always hope for their forgiveness.

I still am skeptical about light punishments for such sexual crimes as pedophilia, edophilia, rape, and sodomy. Of course, the latter isn't technically a sexual crime in all places, it is outlawed in some.

Capital punishment is also an extreme. I don't think life in prison really helps, but there should be more fitting punishments. Doing "time" is simply not effective in curing any sexual perversions and is far from reformative as it is destructive to the person. So I am not sure. Execution is extreme, but doing "time" doesn't do much, and life in prison is still not reformative. I guess I'd be for execution since there are no other, more reformative treatments (execution is reformative, since it causes alot of thinking abolut the Last Things) at this time.

God bless,
Mikey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...