kateri05 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 [quote name='rachael' date='Feb 7 2005, 08:29 PM'] tacos, so very tasty and good for you,. ew. :angry: [/quote] <<gasp>> how DARE you say such a thing! :angry: <<all my tacos, so very tasty and good for you, leave and go cry>> :leave: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxer Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 we as catholics, need to be informed of the evils that roam the earth to destory us, and other innocent people. I say the topics should stay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donna Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 (edited) Great question, dUSt. The sharpest of my pre-pubescent bunch has brought up things to me quite ahead of schedule. I had a fantasy...that they would be exposed mostly to purity...(we'd find that true Catholic school...[i][b]not.)[/b][/i] It is a futile expectation unless one aposatcizes and joins the Amish community. The worst thing to do is to not allow a child that latency period, which is so sweet. I think the parent could be in a good place to judge whether the child is ready enough to see the more delicate threads on PM. BUT the only thing I know of the t/gender thread is what's in this thread; depending on the content, I might forbid it. The worst about Phatmass (in considering my own child) is just what jas said; also, some people's posts are overly graphic when they needn't be. PSPX, I think my husband'd agree with you, maybe fully. As a mother, I don't think I'd have this [i]particular [/i]child on for quite awhile. Not until we had gone through the finer points of of 6th Commandment. This child will require [i]the why [/i]of Church teaching, over time. She's got eyes. All the classmates who come from divorced homes. That kind of child is seen as a lot more normal (2 parents + outside "love interests", or 2 sets of parents, for one child) than we are, trotting in many strong, no cable, no MTV, etc; If the school was teaching sex ed (or even drug prevention), they'd be in the hall. How much (for a teenager) may be brought up by a routine visit with the doctor via Q's on the teen-health questionaire about guns in yo' home, access to birth control and STD's? It would be cruel to not speak w/ them (teen or pre-teen) about weird things. That [i]is [/i]one thing I can do - acknowledge the confusion of living in an apostate world, [i]and[/i] give the supernatural and natural reasons for the wisdom of our Holy Mother's teaching. Unless there is a ban of certain specific topics, parental pride of place could be compromised. But to ouright ban means that the stray souls, [color=red][i]including those from sound homes who cannot help disdaining parental involement for whatever period of time, [/i][/color]are left with...whatever they happen to be left with. The world? Certainly. Virtuous friends? Maybe. Parenting = humility! My opinion therefore, at this time, is that the delicate conversations on PM are a necessary occasion of sin at worst. At best, they are Catholic hands, arms and hearts that that child may well hear. Edited February 11, 2005 by Donna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now