james Posted January 22, 2005 Share Posted January 22, 2005 (edited) [b]Sanhedrin Rabbis Discuss Sublime, Procedural Issues [/b] 11:14 Jan 20, '05 / 10 Shevat 5765 The 71 rabbis seeking to fulfill the Biblical commandment of renewing the Sanhedrin continue to meet regularly, solidifying their organizational structure and establishing an agenda of topics. Their most recent meeting was this week, in which they discussed technical and procedural issues, topics for their agenda, and the Halakhic [Jewish legal] and other ramifications of [b]renewing the Passover sacrifice.[/b] [url="http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=75313"]http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=75313[/url] Edited January 22, 2005 by james Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalyst Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 when will they realise Christ was all the sacrifice they need..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezic Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 they might not but the world is becoming a tinderbox. One spark and it begins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusader1234 Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 I'm frankly really insulted by this post. I think that the Sanhedrin is a [i]great[/i] idea, considering thats basically what the Nation of Israel is all about. And as for your controversial title and bolded letters, do you even know what the Passover Sacrifice happens to be? Doubtful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezic Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 [quote name='crusader1234' date='Jan 23 2005, 01:39 AM'] I'm frankly really insulted by this post. I think that the Sanhedrin is a [i]great[/i] idea, considering thats basically what the Nation of Israel is all about. And as for your controversial title and bolded letters, do you even know what the Passover Sacrifice happens to be? Doubtful. [/quote] by my post or the main one? very few people understand much. THis might seem like something little but waves in the middle of the ocean are also very small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusader1234 Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 No, the main one. It is a big deal, and im my opinion, a good thing. What makes me mad is the fact that it says 'Blood Soon to flow at Temple Mount' and then goes on to make it seem as if Jews are crazy people that are going to renew [b]the passover sacrifice[/b]. The post conjures up thoughts that they're gonna be killing people - but the Passover Sacrifice was a very specific procedure of sacrificing a lamb. Its uneducated posts like James' that make me mad because they are misleading and totally unappropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezic Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 i see now. I wouldn't think of it that way. But i see how some people might. The passover sacrifice has never stopped has it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusader1234 Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 You can't sacrifice without the Temple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezic Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 define sacrifice otherwise what about the Mass today and the continuing eternal sacrifice of Christ?? That isn't void. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusader1234 Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 We're talking about Israel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezic Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 I see then you must mean the ancient passover sacrifice. Did they quit doing that?? If they did, wow am i out of the loop. I thought it was a required feast forever for the Jewish people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelFilo Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 80 AD Titus totally owns Jerusalem. No more temple. No more sacrafice. God bless, Mikey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezic Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 do not the people have their own sacrifice? They didn't have the temple in egypt when the first Passover occured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james Posted January 26, 2005 Author Share Posted January 26, 2005 You are welcome to your opinion that the reestablishment of the Sanhedrin which condemned our Lord to death is a "good thing." I happen to disagree with that opinion. I find that view to be based more in dispensationalism than traditional Catholic teaching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusader1234 Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Be that as it may, how do you explain your lies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now