hyperdulia again Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Check your private messages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aluigi Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 I disagree, I believe Cathqat should ignore all private messages. They are distractions like dogs barking along the road. St. Josemaria Escriva said to ignore such dogs, so the private messages should be ignored as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 *punches Al* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aluigi Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 lol, it's the debate table, just makin sure it doesn't get moved or deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apotheoun Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 [quote name='Aluigi' date='Jan 10 2005, 12:29 AM'] lol, it's the debate table, just makin sure it doesn't get moved or deleted [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 bump 'cause she (you are a chick[girl, woman, female, lady], right?) still hasn't seen it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spathariossa Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 [quote name='hyperdulia again' date='Jan 10 2005, 02:41 AM'] bump 'cause she (you are a chick[girl, woman, female, lady], right?) still hasn't seen it. [/quote] I dunno. She doesn't have a pink fluffy bunny avatar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cathqat Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 I am a chick, yes. Please don't debate that just because it's on the debate table Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spathariossa Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 [quote name='cathqat' date='Jan 10 2005, 03:30 AM'] I am a chick, yes. Please don't debate that just because it's on the debate table [/quote] Well you are lacking a pink fluffy bunny. I'll let it slide this time but make sure you have the quartermaster issue you with one ASAP so no future confusion occurs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cathqat Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 I think you're right. Your fluffy pink bunny [i]does[/i] need teutonic armor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 I don't think the bunny needs armor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spathariossa Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 [quote name='hyperdulia again' date='Jan 10 2005, 03:37 AM'] I don't think the bunny needs armor. [/quote] Heretic!! If anyone sayeth that the Pink Fluffy Bunny doth not have need of armour, let him be anathema! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyperdulia again Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 (edited) "I hereby proclaim, define, and declare that it is necessary for salvation to reject armored bunnies." And thus the Spathariossan Schism was born. Edited January 10, 2005 by hyperdulia again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now