Monoxide Posted December 31, 2004 Author Share Posted December 31, 2004 I must apologize, I need to clarify some points I define the homosexual to be, the person sickened with the disease of same-sex attraction and INDULGING in these urges. A good chaste person with the disease is not a homosexual. They can be often good role models for our youth, to show that no matter how hard evil attacks our humanity it can be held off. I am sorry my mistake, i meant pediphiles as men going after boys, i know the other atrocities happen, but not on the scale of the man - boy aka nambla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benedict Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 I differentiate between homosexuals and practicing homosexuals just as I differentiate between "Catholics" and practicing Catholics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 Thats why the term same sex attraction can be more appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monoxide Posted December 31, 2004 Author Share Posted December 31, 2004 Yes but that generalizes it too much, they are two separate evils. One controls their evil urges, the other indulges in their sinful ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 We ALL control evil urges, because we are ALL sinners. Do you walk around defining people by their sin? Is that a christian attitude? Ah there goes the adulturer Mrs C, here comes the gossip Mrs D. He is the scandalmonger Mr J? We are all first children of GOD, we are all sinful people. There are people with same-sex attraction, there are people who have urges to violence, there are people who have a weakness to substance abuse. You don't define people by their sin, even if they define themselves in that manner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dairygirl4u2c Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 For all the times I haven't agreed with cmother or thought her answers were too simplistic, I just have to give props to that last post. Profound! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phatmasser777 Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 Alugui.. [quote]there's a couple of people on here that struggle with this sickness. i won't name names.[/quote] Brilliant...lol truly brilliant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aluigi Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 what do you mean brillant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phatmasser777 Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 Nvm. Just think Site Demographics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monoxide Posted January 1, 2005 Author Share Posted January 1, 2005 Does everyone understand the differance between the two evils? One has their evil under control (called to chastity) They are role models for us all. The other pratices and indulges in his evil temptations. He is the essance of the Homosexual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted January 1, 2005 Share Posted January 1, 2005 Anybody who has their tempations [drugs, alcohol, sex ,money, power] "under control" is a role modal for us all. Of course as soon as we feel that [u]we[/u] are controlling our impulses we set ourselves up for the great sin of pride. Anyone who is a sinner is practicing and indulging in temptation. He/she is a child of God who is sinning, which does not mean him or her becomes the sin. No human is the essence of sin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monoxide Posted January 2, 2005 Author Share Posted January 2, 2005 So homosexuality is no differant than, say crack cocaine? I like that analogy, however it is unfair to say that it is as physically rewarding as crack, because im almost certain that it isnt. Dont do crack though, its a ghetto drug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Zewe Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 Yeah...I just read the last two posts and briefly skimmed the first page (I would've read the first post, but a mod deleted it...) and here's my two cents... Homosexuality isn't a disease and it isn't evil. Nine times out of ten (at least), homosexuals are BORN gay, they don't choose to be. And no, homosexuality is nothing like crack, as crack is bad for you and is illegal by federal law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Adam Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 Yes, this is the commonly accepted pagan/secularist view. We are born with the inclination to sin, and some born with the inclination to such depravity. True freedom however is found in overcoming such temptation, not in giving in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Zewe Posted January 2, 2005 Share Posted January 2, 2005 That's not telling me how it's evil, however. According to your beliefs, God made men and women so that they could mate together and not within their own gender, correct? Just because you're not using something for the purpose that your God allegedly made it for doesn't make it evil. Christian discrimination against homosexuals is simply due to how small of a minority homosexuals are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts