Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

NEW! Very Rare Permanent Suspensions


dUSt

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I think he rocks. I think it rocks to be an unjust dictator (what an embarassment to monarchical government). I think it rocks to suspend someone for 90 days based on something another person did (who was provoked, anyway, and the person who provoked him receives nothing). I also think it is awesome to ban someone permanently without so much as finding even ONE instance of being uncharitable to others, yeah, that rocks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

littleflower+JMJ

[quote name='amarkich2' date='Dec 2 2004, 10:49 AM'] Yeah, I think he rocks. I think it rocks to be an unjust dictator (what an embarassment to monarchical government). I think it rocks to suspend someone for 90 days based on something another person did (who was provoked, anyway, and the person who provoked him receives nothing). I also think it is awesome to ban someone permanently without so much as finding even ONE instance of being uncharitable to others, yeah, that rocks... [/quote]
dUSt = webmaster


any questions? :D lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh well, then the Holocaust rocks...Hitler = dictator--he can kill all the Jews, priests, religious, etc, that he wants because he is the dictator. It doesn't matter if he is unjust. Hitler rocks, the Holocaust rocks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

littleflower+JMJ

[quote name='Azriel' date='Dec 2 2004, 10:55 AM'] dUSty - you rock dude.  [/quote]
when the velvet hammer says someone rocks......they [i]really[/i] ROCK!! :band: :punk: :headbang:



:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, no one has really made any valid point. They have posed several (stupid) statements but have not made any points. I would like dUst to reply if he would. He does not reply privately, so I assume he will not reply publicly, but if he could please find even one instance of uncharitable behavior on my part, I would welcome the information. Further, if he could somehow justify suspending an innocent person for 90 days (then permanently for appealing the unjust decision), that would be great. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, who cares. You are being very immature signing up again. It's a message board. Dust could ban you because he doesn't like your name or your eye color, and that is his right to do so. This isn't a democracy. It isn't a public service. It is a private message board that Dust maintains and pays for. He is dictator and king. He doesn't have to have a valid point to do anything. But your immaturity in coming back like this shows that his was a just decision any way you look at it.

I've been banned at boards before for "stupid" reasons. You get over it and move on. You said you are done with this board, then be done with it! Signing up with a second name on many boards will get the entire region of IP's banned immediately.

Edited by Brother Adam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said, his decision is his perogative, but my main purpose for returning under amarkich2 (which I stated in the first post) is Canon 219. I came back to defend against untrue and uncharitable comments. Because no one had any more falsehoods and uncharitable comments (for the time), I decided to direct my attention to dUst's unjust actions. He has the ability to do whatever he wants. I do not contest that. I was merely bring up the point that he is unjust and that I would like an explanation for this. He does not have to honor that request. I simply made the request and hope for an answer. The only reason I came back was to defend myself against false allegations, and, in doing so, it was necessary to illustrate the situation at hand (which I did in my first post). Anything elaborating on the actions against me (by dUst) are either an extention of my original purpose (defending myself) or simply me voicing my disgust over the unfair treatment (which was spurred on by rude comments of Azriel (and expounded by little flower). Those were not my original intent, but that was the response to my post, so I simply replied to those responses. That is all, I suppose. I merely want to keep this name until the thread is closed so that I can defend myself (and Matthew) against more lies and slanders. Anything else is just commentary on what others will say. Also--I am done with this board, and I shall be done with it once this thread is closed, for the reasons I have stated several times now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JMJ
12/2 - First Thursday of Advent

[quote]new caramel apple empenadas [/quote]

WHAT?!?! Blast, just when I come to Rome, they put out something like that! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

amarkich and CatholicCrusader, I hope you don't let this situation assume any more importance than it deserves. Prove them wrong and back out with some grace. dUSt is the webmaster, which gives him authority to ban anybody for any reason whatsoever. It doesn't matter who is right or wrong here, all that matters is how much good will be done by making this an issue.
Can we just drop it now? I'm not too happy with some of the content on this thread, not at all. For what that's worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...