Socrates Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 I myself had made private comments to a moderator on pspx's behalf. I don't agree with him an all things, but I don't think he's heretical, and he behaves like a gentlemen, unlike others under discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XIX Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 LOL... I will say that I support this decision, for the reason that he mentioned. I have noticed that Catholic Crusader has had a decidedly uncharitable edge to his posts. It's very very agitating to listen to somebody who preaches in a condescending tone, regardless of how much truth they speak with. Read 1 Corinthians 13. My humble opinion, Crusader can be quite the clanging gong. So I agree that there is a reason to suspend Crusader. I guess as for what the punishment should be, I guess I'll just defer to Dust's judgement on that one. 90 days doesn't seem very outlandish... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paladin D Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 (edited) [quote name='XIX' date='Dec 1 2004, 09:36 PM'] 90 days doesn't seem very outlandish... [/quote] In dUSt's later posts, he decided to ban 4 accounts from the same PC CatholicCrusader was on, [b]permantely[/b]. Edited December 2, 2004 by Paladin D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XIX Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='homeschoolmom' date='Dec 1 2004, 08:10 PM'] I like PSPX also... and I guess I think maybe he's only a little phishy... like a guppy... Whatever, I don't think dUSt is counting votes... [/quote] I agree. Methinks "guppy" is the word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qfnol31 Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 I may not agree with their methods, but remember to be charitable to the brothers. It's not right to bash them and then be uncharitable ourselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homeschoolmom Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 as I said in my original post in this thread, I will pray for them and myself to be more charitable when dealing with each other in the future. I meant it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God Conquers Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 CatholicCrusader may have been a little harsh, but I always thought it interesting when Amarkich weighed in on a topic.... ah well.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcceNovaFacioOmni Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 There is at least three people in the family, all brothers, who posted here. The twin brothers and "catholicguy" (check if his name is banned too). "catholicguy" has been a no show for a while, maybe he was registered under one of the other two names. It seems rather odd, especially since Domina Nostra seemed to have a different perspective than the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 Catholicguy and CatholicCrusader are the same person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homeschoolmom Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 CatholicCrusader admitted over at Flyfree that he and his brother Amerkich held the names CatholicforChrist and DominaNostra as well as HartfordWhalers (and maybe Catholicguy as well, I don't remember). So, there you go. What made it seem like there were many "Phishies" was really mostly the work of two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Aluigi Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 it's only the twins, i asked em on flyfree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleflower+JMJ Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 all hail the dUSt man but four screennames all the same ppl and still trying to come back after being suspended....geez thats crazy they must [i]really[/i] love phatmass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popestpiusx Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 [quote name='XIX' date='Dec 1 2004, 09:40 PM'] I agree. Methinks "guppy" is the word. [/quote] [quote] and I guess I think maybe he's only a little phishy... like a guppy... [/quote] Guppy? Ok, now I'm pissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IcePrincessKRS Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 hahaha I've got this mental picture of you as a guppy.... Oh dear... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcceNovaFacioOmni Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 This situation has reached an uber-wierd level. They didn't really seem like the same person, however, it was apparant that they "knew" each other. How ridiculous. I don't understand their intentions for doing this. Very, very strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts